The correct answer is C. Because on firewall filter the terminating action by default is accept.

If you specify a modifier (count) and dont specify a terminating action,the default behavior of FW filter is aceept

C; The firewall filter is allowing traffic from the source address and logging it, then discarding all others.

Answer is C “When we apply a non-terminating action they technically come with an implicit ALLOW terminating action” https://youtu.be/7LXFonmAKk0 min 3:32

The correct answer is C. If the packet matches all the conditions, and no action is specified in the then statement, the "default" action accept is taken. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/routing-policy/topics/concept/firewall-filter-ex-series-evaluation-understanding.html

"When a firewall filter consists of a single term, the filter is evaluated as follows: If the packet matches all the conditions, the action in the then statement is taken. If the packet matches all the conditions, and no action is specified in the then statement, the default action accept is taken." It looks like the correct answer is C. Please see source that I pasted above: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/routing-policy/topics/concept/firewall-filter-ex-series-evaluation-understanding.html

C is correct. If you don't specify an action in the "then" statement, the default action is "accept".

It is C, the address matches the first term's subnet which is then counted in the building-1 counter and accepted. It says the same thing in Juniper's learning portal.

the correct answer is C

C is the correct answer, when a term match and there is no terminating action the packet is accepted (implicit accept you must add next term or next filter to continue evaluation)

Correct Ans is C When a firewall filter consists of more than one term, the firewall filter is evaluated sequentially: The packet is evaluated against the conditions in the from statement in the first term. If the packet matches all the conditions in the term, the action in the then statement is taken and the evaluation ends. Subsequent terms in the filter are not evaluated. If the packet does not match all the conditions in the term, the packet is evaluated against the conditions in the from statement in the second term. This process continues until either the packet matches the conditions in the from statement in one of the subsequent terms or there are no more terms in the filter. If a packet passes through all the terms in the filter without a match, the packet is discarded.

The correct ans is A

Definitely C. In firewall filters when the matching condition of a term is verified the term is evaluated and the evaluation stops on this term. If no terminating action is specified this is acepted by default. This is slightly different from route policies where in case of a non terminating action the evaluation continue on the next term.

the correct is C, since this question is about firewall filters. The next-term by 'no terminating action implied' is a behaviour of routing-policies

If you specify an action modifier, but do not specify a terminating action, the system implies an action of accept. You can use the count, log, and syslog action modifiers to record information about packets.

I believe C is correct, there r two functions on firwll filter, from and then on "then" statement its saids count. so it will count, this is the instruction been given you can tell a term to look at next policy. for me its C unless count its not an action

A is correct. The default policy is only consulted as a last resort after all other specified policies are evaluated and no terminating action has been matched. In the figure shown, both terms are in the same policy. No default behaviour is used between the 2 terms.