ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Microsoft Discussions
exam questions

Exam 70-741 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 70-741 exam
Go to Exam

Exam 70-741 topic 1 question 71 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's 70-741
Question #: 71
Topic #: 1
[All 70-741 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution. Determine whether the solution meets the stated goals.
Refer to exhibit:

Server1 has two virtual machines named VM1 and VM that run Windows Server 2016. VM1 connects to Private1. VM2 has two network adapters.
You need to ensure that VM1 connects to the corporate network by using NAT.
Solution: You connect VM1 to Inernal1. You run the New-NetNatIpAddress and the New-NetNat cmdlets on Server1. You configure VM1 to use Server1 as the default gateway.
Does this meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
by TMW at June 7, 2019, 1:08 a.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
[Removed]
Highly Voted 5 years, 6 months ago
"New-NetNatIpAddress" no such command exists Answer is NO
upvoted 13 times
GoldenFox
4 years ago
You run the New-NetNatIpAddress and the New-NetNat cmdlets on Server1. You configure VM1 to use Server1 as the default gateway. So command 1 will fail, but New-NetNat is used. So why is this not A. Yes?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
adsl7
Highly Voted 5 years, 3 months ago
Answer is NO. "Before you can configure a Windows Server 2016 computer as a NAT server, you must install the Remote Access server role."
upvoted 11 times
...
Tigz
Most Recent 3 years, 11 months ago
The answer is "B" - No. -Before you can configure a Windows Server 2016 computer as a NAT server, you must install the Remote Access server role.
upvoted 1 times
...
NickTim
4 years, 1 month ago
VM1 connects to Private1, VM2 has two network adapters, yes but connected where?! the answer is incomplete, for me is NO. Question #70 is the correct one.
upvoted 1 times
...
V1980
4 years, 2 months ago
70-740
upvoted 1 times
V1980
4 years, 1 month ago
Sorry, this is 70-741 because it refers to NAT!
upvoted 1 times
...
...
jam7272
4 years, 2 months ago
Yes. NetNat - no need for Routing role. NAT is performed on the VM host over a 'internal' type VM switch.
upvoted 1 times
...
daschicken
4 years, 4 months ago
even if the cmdlet would exist, Server1 does not have the Routing Service installed (we can't assume it) so the command would not even work answer should be NO
upvoted 1 times
...
alexnt
4 years, 5 months ago
"New-NetNatIpAddress" is not a valid command but every site with this question has not corrected it. Maybe MS gives this question with this typo in the exam and if it gives like that the answer is NO due to that typo?
upvoted 1 times
...
Kamikazekiller
4 years, 5 months ago
Answer is B: NO
upvoted 1 times
...
GenjamBhai
4 years, 7 months ago
No as server/host does not have RRAS (Routing) role, can't do NAT without it. 2 scenarios are correct: 1. VM2 connected to Pvt NW (same as VM1) as well as Ext NW. VM2 acts as Default Gateway and NAT for VM1.VM2 must have RRAS installed. 2. VM1 connected to Int NW so it can talk to host. Server/Host acts as Default Gateway and NAT for VM1. Server/Host must have RRAS installed.
upvoted 2 times
GenjamBhai
4 years, 7 months ago
Correction: 2 VM1 connected to Int NW so it can talk to host. Hyper-V Host acts as Default Gateway and NAT for VM1. HV Host has native NAT capability, does NOT need RRAS installed.
upvoted 8 times
Robbie
4 years, 2 months ago
Which makes the answer yes.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
freefree
4 years, 9 months ago
Solution: You connect VM1 to Inernal1. so you already connected it to the internal switch. now you run New-NatIPAddress & New-NetNat rjc thanks for the link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/user-guide/setup-nat-network YES
upvoted 1 times
...
rjc
4 years, 10 months ago
I found this link from Microsoft. It decribes the process of running the New-NetIpAddress (typo in question) and the New-NetNat command. My only conern is in the link you run the new-vmswitch command 1st. I'm guessing the answer yes is correct. Please anyone have differnet idea or view! https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/user-guide/setup-nat-network
upvoted 4 times
...
Nhan
4 years, 10 months ago
The New-NetNat cmdlet creates a Network Address Translation (NAT) object that translates an internal network address to an external network address. A is correct
upvoted 2 times
...
Paz
5 years, 4 months ago
A yes, New-NetNatIpAddress - does not exist new-netnat does and will work https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/netnat/new-netnat?view=win10-ps
upvoted 3 times
a1037040
4 years, 11 months ago
B No You have to go by what is asked in the question, it's contradictory.
upvoted 5 times
...
...
TMW
5 years, 6 months ago
this one appears to me to be correct. Internal switch, and NAT configured on Server1.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago