Get Unlimited Contributor Access to the all ExamTopics Exams!
Take advantage of PDF Files for 1000+ Exams along with community discussions and pass IT Certification Exams Easily.
An AHV administrator wants to take advantage of both maximized network throughput and redundancy for some nodes. Which bond mode should the administrator choose to fit this scenario?
LACP with Balance-TCP
Taking full advantage of bandwidth provided by multiple links to upstream switches, from
a single VM, requires dynamically negotiated link aggregation and load balancing using
balance-tcp. Nutanix recommends dynamic link aggregation with LACP instead of static link
aggregation due to improved failure detection and recovery.
Naah, Nutanix doesn’t recommend balance-slb because of the multicast traffic caveats. To combine the bandwidth of multiple links, consider using link aggregation with LACP and balance-tcp instead of balance-slb. Don’t use balance-slb unless you verify that the multicast limitations described here aren’t present in your network.
Yeah and for the redundancy part, I know balance-tcp fails back to active-backup in case of a link failure. I'm not sure if the same is true of balance-slb
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
mjcher
1Â year, 7Â months agoejimenezn
1Â year, 10Â months agooliv_
2Â years, 1Â month agoQuietman
2Â years, 6Â months agoRandy_Sievers
2Â years, 1Â month ago