Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.

Unlimited Access

Get Unlimited Contributor Access to the all ExamTopics Exams!
Take advantage of PDF Files for 1000+ Exams along with community discussions and pass IT Certification Exams Easily.

Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner topic 3 question 13 discussion

Actual exam question from PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Practitioner
Question #: 13
Topic #: 3
[All PRINCE2-Practitioner Questions]

A change authority has been appointed for the project. During the development of the 'classroom-based training material', a large number of changes were proposed to the design of the 'e-learning course'. Therefore, the change authority has decided to use the Moscow technique to prioritize changes based on the impact they will have on completing each stage on time.
Is this an appropriate application of the Moscow technique, and why?

  • A. Yes, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the estimated impact on time.
  • B. Yes, because it is a prioritization technique that should be used to prioritize a product's quality criteria.
  • C. No, because it should define scope tolerances, supporting the management by exception principle.
  • D. No, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the project's business justification.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
Reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoSCoW_method

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
ravi_aws
6 months ago
D. No, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the project's business justification
upvoted 2 times
...
ManikRoy
6 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Refer 9.4.1 MoSCoW can be used for other types of prioritization, such as prioritizing changes, by adapting the criteria as necessary. When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2's continued business. justification principle
upvoted 1 times
...
chriscilia81
6 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Definitely its a 'yes' answer (There are many ways to prioritize a change request and PRINCE2 introduces the MoSCoW technique - p2wiki), and relates to the entire quality, not just the time. Therefore, answer is B.
upvoted 1 times
...
VSLM
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
prioritize requirements according to business justification
upvoted 2 times
...
PieroBe
8 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
I think it is C. MoSCoW technique is a way of prioritizing product requirements so basically setting tolerances on the project scope (what the project has to deliver) supporting managing by exception (in this case scope exceptions).
upvoted 1 times
...
ameyaengg
1 year, 6 months ago
D is correct Answer
upvoted 3 times
...
Trikuta_Kaira
1 year, 7 months ago
9.4.1 The MoSCoW prioritization technique: When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2’s continued business justification principle.
upvoted 3 times
...
sunee
2 years, 11 months ago
yes correct answer is d
upvoted 1 times
...
cchemik
3 years, 4 months ago
correct is d
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...