exam questions

Exam 5V0-21.19 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 5V0-21.19 exam

Exam 5V0-21.19 topic 1 question 81 discussion

Actual exam question from VMware's 5V0-21.19
Question #: 81
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-21.19 Questions]

A vSAN administrator has three available racks and six vSAN hosts.
What can a vSAN administrator use to protect against a rack failure while maximizing resources?

  • A. explicit fault domain
  • B. vSAN stretched cluster
  • C. 2-node configuration
  • D. RAID-6/FTT=2
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
Reference:
https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.5/com.vmware.vsphere.virtualsan.doc/GUID-8491C4B0-6F94-4023-8C7A-FD7B40D0368D.html

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
LCOJ
Highly Voted 4 years, 10 months ago
I agree with answer A: When you provision a virtual machine on the cluster with fault domains, Virtual SAN distributes protection components, such as witnesses and replicas of the virtual machine objects across different fault domains. As a result, the Virtual SAN environment becomes capable of tolerating entire rack failures in addition to a single host, storage disk, or network failure. https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.5/com.vmware.vsphere.virtualsan.doc/GUID-C365ACE8-7485-4463-A12C-71D1917A4930.html
upvoted 5 times
...
hsezer
Most Recent 2 years, 3 months ago
With explicit fault domains and raid-1 mirroring policy, we can tolerate one rack failure. Also with every host is single fault domain and ftt=2 raid-6 policy we can still tolerate one rack failure. Question also marked that maximizing resources, so i choose D.
upvoted 1 times
...
Pandech
3 years, 3 months ago
5v0-22.21 A vSAN administrator has three available racks and six vSAN hosts and needs to protect against a rack failure while maximizing resources. Which two strategies should the vSAN administrator use to achieve this goal? (Choose two.) A. RAID-5/FTT=1 B. vSAN stretched cluster C. Specify fault domain D. RAID-6/FTT=2 E. 2-node configuration the answer is ?
upvoted 1 times
exam_survivor
3 years, 1 month ago
C and D
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Lazylinux
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: A
For sure
upvoted 1 times
...
Virtual_ITTech
3 years, 5 months ago
key phrase in the question is "protection against Rack Failure". A- has to be the correct answer. RAID-6 requires 6 racks, which we do not have.
upvoted 1 times
...
wabim71208
4 years ago
Usually I fully agree with diegof1 answers. But here I would give my point to Aolivera and answer D. We have 6 hosts and 3 raks so 2 hosts per rack. In RAID6 we are protected for 2 host failure. So in worst case scenario those 2 hosts will be in same rack. This answere under circumstances mentinoed in qestion is covering all assumptions. -maximising resources -resiliance to whole rack failure
upvoted 1 times
ALLOY
3 years, 10 months ago
BUT IF WE PUT ALL THE NODES IN ONE RACK , AND THEN LOSE THE RACK , RAID 6 WILL BE AS MUCH USEFULL
upvoted 2 times
ALLOY
3 years, 10 months ago
WILL NOT BE , SORRY
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
diegof1
4 years, 4 months ago
A is the correct answer. vSAN supports the creation of explicit fault domains. Explicit fault domains: • Increase availability • Protect against rack and other types of failures • Ensure redundancy components of the same object do not live in the same rack Taken from vSAN 6.7 Deploy and Manage Lecture Manual - Explicit Fault Domains section
upvoted 3 times
...
HBDevil
4 years, 7 months ago
The correct answer is A. Because of Rack.
upvoted 3 times
...
Aolivera
4 years, 8 months ago
I would say D. Question states maximising resources. A 100 GB will take 200GB on FTT=1 raid 1 while it will take 150 in Raid 6 and having 3 racks with 2 ESXi servers would be no problem for that configuration as max errors on the worse case will be 2 in the same rack.
upvoted 1 times
safodz
3 years, 11 months ago
for RAID and FTT2 we need at least 06 rack three rack
upvoted 1 times
...
alsmk2
4 years, 8 months ago
I agree - logic is spot on.
upvoted 1 times
AliBen
4 years, 1 month ago
but the solution won't guarantee that : • Ensure redundancy components of the same object do not live in the same rack
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago