A vSAN administrator has three available racks and six vSAN hosts. What can a vSAN administrator use to protect against a rack failure while maximizing resources?
I agree with answer A: When you provision a virtual machine on the cluster with fault domains, Virtual SAN distributes protection components, such as witnesses and replicas of the virtual machine objects across different fault domains. As a result, the Virtual SAN environment becomes capable of tolerating entire rack failures in addition to a single host, storage disk, or network failure.
https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.5/com.vmware.vsphere.virtualsan.doc/GUID-C365ACE8-7485-4463-A12C-71D1917A4930.html
With explicit fault domains and raid-1 mirroring policy, we can tolerate one rack failure. Also with every host is single fault domain and ftt=2 raid-6 policy we can still tolerate one rack failure. Question also marked that maximizing resources, so i choose D.
5v0-22.21
A vSAN administrator has three available racks and six vSAN hosts and needs to protect
against a rack failure while maximizing resources.
Which two strategies should the vSAN administrator use to achieve this goal? (Choose two.)
A. RAID-5/FTT=1
B. vSAN stretched cluster
C. Specify fault domain
D. RAID-6/FTT=2
E. 2-node configuration
the answer is ?
Usually I fully agree with diegof1 answers. But here I would give my point to Aolivera and answer D.
We have 6 hosts and 3 raks so 2 hosts per rack.
In RAID6 we are protected for 2 host failure.
So in worst case scenario those 2 hosts will be in same rack.
This answere under circumstances mentinoed in qestion is covering all assumptions.
-maximising resources
-resiliance to whole rack failure
A is the correct answer.
vSAN supports the creation of explicit fault domains.
Explicit fault domains:
• Increase availability
• Protect against rack and other types of
failures
• Ensure redundancy components of the same object do not live in the same rack
Taken from vSAN 6.7 Deploy and Manage Lecture Manual - Explicit Fault Domains section
I would say D. Question states maximising resources.
A 100 GB will take 200GB on FTT=1 raid 1 while it will take 150 in Raid 6 and having 3 racks with 2 ESXi servers would be no problem for that configuration as max errors on the worse case will be 2 in the same rack.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
LCOJ
Highly Voted 4 years, 10 months agohsezer
Most Recent 2 years, 3 months agoPandech
3 years, 3 months agoexam_survivor
3 years, 1 month agoLazylinux
3 years, 4 months agoVirtual_ITTech
3 years, 5 months agowabim71208
4 years agoALLOY
3 years, 10 months agoALLOY
3 years, 10 months agodiegof1
4 years, 4 months agoHBDevil
4 years, 7 months agoAolivera
4 years, 8 months agosafodz
3 years, 11 months agoalsmk2
4 years, 8 months agoAliBen
4 years, 1 month ago