Exam AWS Certified SysOps Administrator - Associate topic 1 question 359 discussion

1. Maximize discounts: Option B with partial prepayment may offer higher discounts than Option A with no prepayment. 2. Avoid unused reservations: Savings Plans are highly flexible and minimize the risk of unused reservations when migrating from EC2 to Fargate. 3. Migrate to Fargate in 6 months: Option B with a partial prepayment commitment is suitable when a company plans to fully migrate to Fargate within 6 months, and given this, is more concerned with mid- to long-term cost savings than short-term gains. Considering these factors, Option B: Calculating Savings Plans for one year using the Partial Prepayment option would be the most appropriate for the requirements.

What about B? Partial payment open will save more than no payment option. 25% vs 20%

'retire EC2 instances and use only Fargate' --> change crew. --> 'partial' --> choose B or D. --> EC2 or compute still in use after changing? compute. (only Fargate, no more EC2) --> choose B.

B here, you can check this link and see prices -> https://aws.amazon.com/savingsplans/compute-pricing/

going with B

going with B

. If the company values cash flow or expects changes in their Fargate usage over time, they might not want to commit a large amount of capital upfront

Compute Savings Plans: These are flexible pricing plans for Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate that offer significant savings over pay-as-you-go pricing. Savings Plans provide consistent savings regardless of instance family, size, OS, or region. 1 year term: Choosing a 1-year commitment provides a balance between commitment and flexibility. No Upfront payment option: This option does not require an upfront payment, providing flexibility without the need for an initial cost. While No Upfront plans might have slightly higher hourly rates compared to Partial or All Upfront plans, they offer more flexibility, and the SysOps administrator can avoid making an upfront payment. This option allows the company to benefit from cost savings through a 1-year commitment without the need for an upfront payment, aligning well with the plan to move to Fargate within 6 months. It also ensures flexibility and minimizes the risk of unused reservations.

cash is king

it the one company can use fargate and has more % discounts

Compute Savings Plans for 1 year with the Partial Upfront payment give provides higher discount. "The company has been able to estimate its future Fargate costs." - meaning they already know the compute requirements. Option A gives lesser discount. https://aws.amazon.com/savingsplans/compute-pricing/

Given the company's plan to move to Fargate within 6 months and retire EC2 instances, it might be more cost-efficient to choose Option A (No Upfront payment). This way, the company avoids any upfront commitment and can easily transition to Fargate without being tied to EC2 instances. Savings Plans apply to both EC2 and Fargate, making it a suitable option for the planned migration.

B is correct

To minimize costs while maximizing discounts and ensuring that there are no unused reservations, the SysOps administrator should choose A. Compute Savings Plans for 1 year with the No Upfront payment option. Compute Savings Plans provide a discount of up to 66% compared to on-demand usage, and they apply to Fargate usage as well as EC2 usage. The No Upfront payment option allows the company to pay for their usage as they go, without any upfront payment, which can help minimize costs and avoid unused reservations.

B instead of A, partial saves more than no upfront

must Be B, partial saves more than no upfront

A is answer