ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Amazon Discussions
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam
Go to Exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 580 discussion

Exam question from Amazon's AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03
Question #: 580
Topic #: 1
[All AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Questions]

A company uses locally attached storage to run a latency-sensitive application on premises. The company is using a lift and shift method to move the application to the AWS Cloud. The company does not want to change the application architecture.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

  • A. Configure an Auto Scaling group with an Amazon EC2 instance. Use an Amazon FSx for Lustre file system to run the application.
  • B. Host the application on an Amazon EC2 instance. Use an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) GP2 volume to run the application.
  • C. Configure an Auto Scaling group with an Amazon EC2 instance. Use an Amazon FSx for OpenZFS file system to run the application.
  • D. Host the application on an Amazon EC2 instance. Use an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) GP3 volume to run the application.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️
by Ale1973 at Aug. 9, 2023, 1:55 p.m.
Disclaimers:
  • - ExamTopics website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by Amazon.
  • - Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to Amazon.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
TariqKipkemei
Highly Voted 7 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
MOST cost-effectively =GP3
upvoted 5 times
...
potomac
Most Recent 7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
gp3 offers SSD-performance at a 20% lower cost per GB than gp2 volumes.
upvoted 3 times
...
bojila
10 months ago
GP3 is the lastest version
upvoted 3 times
...
Hades2231
10 months ago
Selected Answer: D
GP3 is the lastest version, and it is cost effective
upvoted 3 times
...
Guru4Cloud
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
GP3 is preferable over GP2, FSx for Lustre, and FSx for OpenZFS is clear and convincing: GP3 offers identical latency performance to GP2 at a lower price point. FSx options are higher performance but more expensive and require application changes. GP3 aligns better with lift and shift needs as a directly attached block storage volume.
upvoted 4 times
...
taustin2
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
Migrate your Amazon EBS volumes from gp2 to gp3 and save up to 20% on costs.
upvoted 3 times
...
Vadbro7
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Y not gp2
upvoted 1 times
...
Ale1973
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
My rational: Options A y C are based on autoscaling-group and no make sense for me on this scenary. Then, use Amazon EBS is the solution and GP2 or GP3 is the question. Requirement requires the most COST effective solution, then, I choose GP3
upvoted 4 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel