ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Amazon Discussions
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam
Go to Exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 topic 1 question 341 discussion

Exam question from Amazon's AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02
Question #: 341
Topic #: 1
[All AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions]

A company needs to optimize the cost of its application on AWS. The application uses AWS Lambda functions and Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) containers that run on AWS Fargate. The application is write-heavy and stores data in an Amazon Aurora MySQL database.

The load on the application is not consistent. The application experiences long periods of no usage, followed by sudden and significant increases and decreases in traffic. The database runs on a memory optimized DB instance that cannot handle the load.

A solutions architect must design a solution that can scale to handle the changes in traffic.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

  • A. Add additional read replicas to the database. Purchase Instance Savings Plans and RDS Reserved Instances.
  • B. Migrate the database to an Aurora DB cluster that has multiple writer instances. Purchase Instance Savings Plans.
  • C. Migrate the database to an Aurora global database. Purchase Compute Savings Plans and RDS Reserved instances.
  • D. Migrate the database to Aurora Serverless v1. Purchase Compute Savings Plans.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️
by devalenzuela86 at Nov. 21, 2023, 10:12 p.m.
Disclaimers:
  • - ExamTopics website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by Amazon.
  • - Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to Amazon.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
GaryQian
Highly Voted 1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Aurora Serverless designed to be handling heavy and unpredictable load while Aurora global table is more on low-lantency connection
upvoted 8 times
...
salazar35
Highly Voted 1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Aurora Serverless v1 provides a relatively simple, cost-effective option for infrequent, intermittent, or unpredictable workloads
upvoted 6 times
...
asquared16
Most Recent 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
I guess this is a very old question; as of today, Aurora Serverless v1 is going EOL by December, 2024. So, invalid question. But if we still had to make a decision with D, it will be B.
upvoted 1 times
...
career360guru
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Option D. This question looks incomplete as it does not give options for cost savings opportunity for application layer.
upvoted 2 times
...
shaaam80
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Answer D Aurora Serverless can scale better to handle heavy loads
upvoted 2 times
...
Russs99
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Per scenario, the application is write intensive and the load varies due to burst. Aurora Serverless with compute saving plans is the correct answer
upvoted 2 times
...
devalenzuela86
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D for sure
upvoted 3 times
devalenzuela86
1 year, 5 months ago
Change to C. Its most cost effective
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago