Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 topic 1 question 346 discussion

Option D seems to be the best fit: Amazon ECS with EC2 offers the needed control and orchestration capabilities. Amazon Aurora MySQL Serverless v2 can support the relational database model, though it requires adapting from Microsoft SQL Server to MySQL. Amazon SQS aligns well with the need for asynchronous messaging and can be a suitable replacement for MSMQ.

D is right To meet all of the company's requirements, they should host their .NET Core components on Amazon ECS using the EC2 launch type to gain full control over networking and host configuration. Hosting the database on Amazon Aurora MySQL Serverless v2 allows them to use a strongly relational database model. Since the original application communicates asynchronously by using Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ), Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) can be used for an alternative solution.

" company must have full control over networking and host configuration" points to EC2. "database model is strongly relational" points to RDS/Aurora

A - eventbridge for replacing MSMQ？ B - dynamodb is not relational C - Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL serverless v2 is not existing

SQS is perfect solution for queue solution replacement.

Option D

D :- Containerization and Orchestration: Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that can seamlessly manage containerized .NET Core components. The EC2 launch type provides full control over the underlying EC2 instances, enabling customization of networking and host configuration as needed. 2. Relational Database: Amazon RDS for SQL Server is a managed relational database service that natively supports SQL Server, aligning perfectly with the application's strongly relational database model. 3. Asynchronous Messaging: D is ans Amazon SQS offers a reliable and scalable managed message queueing service that mirrors the functionality of MSMQ, ensuring smooth integration with the existing application architecture

A Moving from SQL Server to RDS is the easiest. RDS allows network control customisation https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/custom-setup-sqlserver.html#custom-setup-sqlserver.iam-vpc also App Runner is good for .Net code https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apprunner/latest/dg/service-source-code-net6.html

Option D. Since the company wants control over host networking, EC2 is the best choice compared to Fargate or Beanstalk. Aurora MySQL is relational.

D - DB is strongly relational

Because the DB is strongly relational

B for sure

D is the correct answer