exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 939 discussion

A company uses an Amazon RDS for MySQL instance. To prepare for end-of-year processing, the company added a read replica to accommodate extra read-only queries from the company's reporting tool. The read replica CPU usage was 60% and the primary instance CPU usage was 60%.

After end-of-year activities are complete, the read replica has a constant 25% CPU usage. The primary instance still has a constant 60% CPU usage. The company wants to rightsize the database and still provide enough performance for future growth.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  • A. Delete the read replica Do not make changes to the primary instance
  • B. Resize the read replica to a smaller instance size Do not make changes to the primary instance
  • C. Resize the read replica to a larger instance size Resize the primary instance to a smaller instance size
  • D. Delete the read replica Resize the primary instance to a larger instance
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Oghare
Highly Voted 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Answer is B Since the read replica is now underutilized with only 25% CPU usage, it can be resized to a smaller instance to save costs while still handling the reduced read queries. No changes to the primary instance are needed, as it is consistently running at 60% CPU usage, which is manageable, and the read replica will still offload read queries in the future.
upvoted 7 times
...
7dcef09
Most Recent 2 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
Delete the read replica and resize the primary instance seems to be the right choice for this question
upvoted 1 times
...
Sarayounisaldossary
2 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
You should remove an underused resource (read replica). Use that budget to increase primary capacity, solving the CPU load. Even though Option B is “safe” and cost-conscious, it ignores the performance needs of the primary, which is where the real issue lies. Option D is more aligned with AWS best practices and the question's goal of performance + future growth.
upvoted 2 times
...
LeonSauveterre
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Not A or D because they risk future scalability issues during traffic spikes. Moreover, when the end of next year comes, you have to bring back the deleted instance and configure it all over again. As a solutions architect, I wouldn't recommend things like that (personally).
upvoted 2 times
...
Ghoneam
6 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
D. Delete the read replica Resize the primary instance to a larger instance because no need for read replica after year end still provide enough performance for future growth.
upvoted 4 times
...
Abdullah2004
10 months ago
No clear explanation here and everyone agreed with default answer
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
B looks good
upvoted 1 times
...
aragon_saa
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Answer is B
upvoted 1 times
...
muhammadahmer36
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Resize the read replica to a smaller instance size Do not make changes to the primary instance
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...