Suggested Answer:B🗳️
Explanation - Reduced Redundancy Storage (RRS) was introduced in order to reduce storage costs. When first developed, you could use reduced redundancy storage for noncritical, reproducible data at lower levels of redundancy than Amazon S3 provides with standard storage. Now Standard is a more af-fordable from a cost perspective, because Amazon is deprecating RRS and has changed the pricing structure. Reference: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/UsingRRS.html
Before its planned deprecation, the recommended use case for S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage (RRS) was to reduce storage costs for noncritical data. S3 RRS offered a lower level of redundancy compared to the standard storage class, which made it more cost-effective. It was suitable for data that could be easily reproduced or had other backup mechanisms in place, making it ideal for noncritical or easily replaceable data.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
albert_kuo
10 months, 1 week agoawscertified
2 years, 6 months ago