exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 topic 1 question 341 discussion

A company needs to store data in Amazon S3. A compliance requirement states that when any changes are made to objects the previous state of the object with any changes must be preserved. Additionally, files older than 5 years should not be accessed but need to be archived for auditing.
What should a solutions architect recommend that is MOST cost-effective?

  • A. Enable object-level versioning and S3 Object Lock in governance mode
  • B. Enable object-level versioning and S3 Object Lock in compliance mode
  • C. Enable object-level versioning. Enable a lifecycle policy to move data older than 5 years to S3 Glacier Deep Archive
  • D. Enable object-level versioning. Enable a lifecycle policy to move data older than 5 years to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA)
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Alileva
Highly Voted 3 years, 8 months ago
Answer is C Because Object Locks (A,B) only prevent deleting or overwriting but still accessible https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/object-lock-overview.html
upvoted 22 times
Always_Wanting_Stuff
3 years, 7 months ago
I agree the answer is C, but your explanation of object locks is a little confusing. Where does it mention in the question that previous versions of the files should not be accessible?
upvoted 5 times
Always_Wanting_Stuff
3 years, 7 months ago
Object lock is used with S3 versioning to prevent the deletion of versions.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
tantien
Highly Voted 3 years, 7 months ago
The answer is C but I don't care what your boss said, I'm a human being!
upvoted 15 times
...
queen101
Most Recent 2 years, 10 months ago
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. Versioning + Glacier
upvoted 1 times
...
marklovesaws143
2 years, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: C
CCCCCCCCCCCCCC
upvoted 1 times
...
AshenOne_31
2 years, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: C
What the hell does "Most Effortable" mean? Answer is C
upvoted 3 times
...
slcheng
2 years, 11 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Agreed with C
upvoted 1 times
...
ihustle
3 years, 2 months ago
lifecycle policy or migration to a difference class of S3 is first to save storage cost, with accessibility in mind. Object lock on the other hand prevents deletion, the question says data must be retained after 5 years for auditing purposes, meaning data older than 5 years must not be deleted, I suppose we can still delete data stored in glacier if we want, we can also delete versions of objects if we want to, but once they are locked, deletion is impossible, that way they are kept for auditing purposes. B is the right choice.
upvoted 2 times
...
awsnoobster
3 years, 3 months ago
C - trust me, i have now become an S3 expert after going through these questions servra times :-D!
upvoted 1 times
...
viklal016
3 years, 3 months ago
This question appeared in the exam with a tweak. I passed the exam yesterday. Thanks examtopics and those who contributed! Question had two choices. I don't remember the exact wordings but, it also ask to delete objects after five years. With Governance Mode it is possible to delete the object with special permissions I chose A & C
upvoted 5 times
...
FF11
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C is correct.
upvoted 1 times
...
Vijay1986
3 years, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C - since data can be "modified" if required by restoring from Glacier Deep Archive and also the data can be "retained to original data" by using object level versioning
upvoted 2 times
...
gargaditya
3 years, 6 months ago
Why not object lock/auditing,compliance ->Lock will prevent tampering? Governance mode allows root user to make modification to lock whereas Compliance mode does not allow changes by anyone.
upvoted 1 times
gargaditya
3 years, 6 months ago
Rather,object moved to Glacier can be restored, deletion is still possible; I would go with B.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
paoloscott
3 years, 6 months ago
Answer is C 100%
upvoted 2 times
...
jkwek
3 years, 7 months ago
Answer is C. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-amazon-s3-storage-class-glacier-deep-archive/
upvoted 4 times
...
KK_uniq
3 years, 7 months ago
C for sure
upvoted 2 times
...
haaris786
3 years, 7 months ago
C 100%
upvoted 3 times
...
syu31svc
3 years, 7 months ago
No argument here Answer is C 101%
upvoted 4 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...