exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C02 topic 1 question 319 discussion

A company is creating a web application that will store a large number of images in Amazon S3. The images will be accessed by users over variable periods of time. The company wants to:
✑ Retain all the images
✑ Incur no cost for retrieval.
✑ Have minimal management overhead.
✑ Have the images available with no impact on retrieval time.
Which solution meets these requirements?

  • A. Implement S3 Intelligent-Tiering
  • B. Implement S3 storage class analysis
  • C. Implement an S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA).
  • D. Implement an S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA).
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
painkillers
Highly Voted 3 years, 6 months ago
The answer is A. There is "two opt-in archive access tiers" in the page. S3 Intelligent-Tiering works by storing objects in four access tiers: two low latency access tiers optimized for frequent and infrequent access, and two opt-in archive access tiers designed for asynchronous access that are optimized for rare access.
upvoted 20 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost.
upvoted 2 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Sorry for my mistake It's A, Nice explanation by NJo.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
Goozian
Highly Voted 3 years, 6 months ago
A) https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/11/s3-intelligent-tiering/ ✑ Retain all the images => “S3 Intelligent-Tiering is designed for 99.9% availability and 99.999999999% durability” ✑ Incur no cost for retrieval => "There are no retrieval fees in S3 Intelligent-Tiering" ✑ Have minimal management overhead. => "without performance impact or operational overhead" ✑ Have the images available with no impact on retrieval time => "offers the same low latency and high throughput performance of S3 Standard"
upvoted 12 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost.
upvoted 2 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Sorry for my mistake It's A, Nice explanation by NJo.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
BECAUSE
Most Recent 1 year, 11 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is the answer
upvoted 1 times
...
sofiella
2 years, 3 months ago
C. Implement an S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA). Implementing an S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) can meet all of the requirements. S3 Standard-IA is a storage class that is designed for infrequently accessed data and provides a lower retrieval cost than S3 Standard. This will help to minimize costs for retrieval and management, and the images will still be available with no impact on retrieval time. This option also retains all the images. Option A. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is designed to automatically move data between storage classes based on access patterns, but it would not provide no cost for retrieval. Option B. S3 storage class analysis provides insights into how data is stored and accessed, but it would not directly help in achieving the requirements.
upvoted 1 times
...
sofiella
2 years, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Implement an S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA).
upvoted 1 times
...
examJack
3 years, 1 month ago
A.(O) There are no retrieval charges in S3 Intelligent-Tiering. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/intelligent-tiering.html The S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class is designed to optimize storage costs by automatically moving data to the most cost-effective access tier when access patterns change, without operational overhead or impact on performance. For a small monthly object monitoring and automation charge, S3 Intelligent-Tiering monitors access patterns and automatically moves objects that have not been accessed to lower-cost access tiers. B.(X) have management overhead Amazon S3 analytics – Storage Class Analysis By using Amazon S3 analytics Storage Class Analysis you can analyze storage access patterns to help you decide when to transition the right data to the right storage class. C. D. (X) manual management and it has management overhead
upvoted 1 times
...
FF11
3 years, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is correct.
upvoted 1 times
...
Shubz
3 years, 6 months ago
Variable Period of time = A
upvoted 2 times
samuel1999
3 years, 5 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost
upvoted 1 times
...
...
shantest1
3 years, 7 months ago
s3-intelligent-tiering - it can move it to IA (infrequently access) and Archive (Glacier) So I think C is the answer not A.
upvoted 8 times
samuel1999
3 years, 5 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost
upvoted 1 times
...
cnmc
3 years, 6 months ago
That is right, based on the link below. Intelligent Tiering can move your objects into Archive which is similar to Glacier, so there will be retrieval time https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/
upvoted 2 times
...
...
jkwek
3 years, 7 months ago
answer is A. the url reveal the answer. https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/11/s3-intelligent-tiering/
upvoted 7 times
...
KK_uniq
3 years, 7 months ago
A for sure
upvoted 2 times
samuel1999
3 years, 5 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost
upvoted 1 times
...
...
NJo
3 years, 7 months ago
I'll go with A based on below text from the link: "S3 Intelligent-Tiering stores objects in two access tiers: one tier that is optimized for frequent access and another lower-cost tier that is optimized for infrequent access. For a small monthly monitoring and automation fee per object, S3 Intelligent-Tiering monitors access patterns and moves objects that have not been accessed for 30 consecutive days to the infrequent access tier. There are no retrieval fees in S3 Intelligent-Tiering. If an object in the infrequent access tier is accessed later, it is automatically moved back to the frequent access tier. No additional tiering fees apply when objects are moved between access tiers within the S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class. " https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/11/s3-intelligent-tiering/
upvoted 5 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost.
upvoted 1 times
Harshul
3 years, 6 months ago
Sorry for my mistake It's A, Nice explanation by NJo.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
NJo
3 years, 7 months ago
It also aligns with below requirement in the question: "Have minimal management overhead."
upvoted 2 times
...
samuel1999
3 years, 5 months ago
Answer should be 'B". It says no retrieval cost should incur. Now thin of a scenario when data is not accessed for over period of time and it's moved to Glacier and then if client wants to access that data that will incur retrieval cost
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Kopa
3 years, 7 months ago
Im more into C
upvoted 4 times
...
Arnaud35890
3 years, 7 months ago
A seems to be an acceptable option, however, can someone know if Intelligent Tiering will have no impact on the retrieval time?
upvoted 2 times
...
mickop
3 years, 7 months ago
AAAAAAAAA
upvoted 2 times
...
Tun_AWS
3 years, 7 months ago
D for me, availability is not part of the requirement furthermore it still uses intelligent tiring and is not costly
upvoted 1 times
Tun_AWS
3 years, 7 months ago
Sorry option A given the company want to retain all data and retaining all data in s3 standard or one zone will be expensive in the long run
upvoted 1 times
...
...
syu31svc
3 years, 7 months ago
This is A for sure
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago