Your company decides to use Amazon S3 to augment its on-premises data store. Instead of using the company's highly controlled, on-premises Internet gateway, a Direct Connect connection is ordered to provide high bandwidth, low latency access to S3. Since the company does not own a publically routable IPv4 address block, a request was made to AWS for an AWS-owned address for a Public Virtual Interface (VIF).
The security team is calling this new connection a `backdoor`, and you have been asked to clarify the risk to the company.
Which concern from the security team is valid and should be addressed?
CloudTrail
Highly Voted 3 years, 9 months agoTron09
Highly Voted 3 years, 9 months agoTron09
3 years, 9 months agodouglasaws
3 years, 8 months agowahlbergusa
3 years, 8 months agoPorkChop1999
Most Recent 1 year, 3 months agoPavanKushwah123
2 years, 6 months agoBala34
2 years, 7 months agocdeavila
2 years, 9 months agoanchen
2 years, 9 months agorpani
3 years agoChauPhan
3 years, 8 months agoNSF2
3 years, 8 months agoNSF2
3 years, 8 months agodouglasaws
3 years, 8 months agoChauPhan
3 years, 8 months agolunt
3 years, 8 months agocdeavila
2 years, 9 months agofirstabed
3 years, 8 months agoScunningham99
3 years, 8 months agoasdf99
3 years, 8 months agoJoe321
3 years, 8 months ago