Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 129 discussion

I would say A and E since Aurora and Fargate are serverless (less operational overhead).

Aurora and Fargate are the answers

Ans A,E - -PostgreSQL is compatible with Aurora -Fargate for container service Both services are serverless

A and E since both Aurora and fargate are serverless.

PostgreSQL is compatible w/ Aurora Fargate & ECS are also paired with containers A&E

I would say A and E since Aurora and Fargate are serverless (less operational overhead)

Requirement is to reduce operational overhead, Amazon Aurora provides built-in security, continuous backups, serverless compute, up to 15 read replicas, automated multi-Region replication. AWS Fargate is a serverless, pay-as-you-go compute engine that lets you focus on building applications without managing servers.

The reasons are: Migrating the database to Amazon Aurora provides a high performance, scalable PostgreSQL-compatible database with minimal overhead. Migrating the containerized web app to Fargate removes the need to provision and manage EC2 instances. Fargate auto-scales. Together, Aurora and Fargate reduce operational overhead and complexity for the data and application tiers.

A is the correct answer because migrating the database to Amazon Aurora reduces operational overhead and offers scalability and automated backups. E is the correct answer because migrating the web application to AWS Fargate with Amazon ECS eliminates the need for infrastructure management, simplifies deployment, and improves resource utilization. B. Migrating the web application to Amazon EC2 instances would not directly address the operational overhead and capacity planning concerns mentioned in the scenario. C. Setting up an Amazon CloudFront distribution improves content delivery but does not directly address the operational overhead or capacity planning limitations. D. Configuring Amazon ElastiCache improves performance but does not directly address the operational overhead or capacity planning challenges mentioned. Therefore, the correct answers are A and E as they address the requirements, while the incorrect answers (B, C, D) do not provide the desired solutions.

Improve the application's infrastructure = Modernize Infrastructure = Least Operational Overhead = Serverless

A and E are the best options.

A and E

a e..............

One should that Aurora is not serverless. Aurora serverless and Aurora are 2 Amazon services. I prefer C, however the question does not mention any frontend requirements.

Yes, go for A and E since thes two ressources are serverless.

The correct answers are A and E. To improve the application's infrastructure, the solutions architect should migrate the PostgreSQL database to Amazon Aurora and migrate the web application to be hosted on AWS Fargate with Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS). Amazon Aurora is a fully managed, scalable, and highly available relational database service that is compatible with PostgreSQL. Migrating the database to Amazon Aurora would reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the database infrastructure and allow the company to focus on building and scaling the application. AWS Fargate is a fully managed container orchestration service that enables users to run containers without the need to manage the underlying EC2 instances. By using AWS Fargate with Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), the solutions architect can improve the scalability and efficiency of the web application and reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the underlying infrastructure.

A and E are obvious choices.