exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 topic 1 question 35 discussion

A company is storing data on premises on a Windows file server. The company produces 5 GB of new data daily.
The company migrated part of its Windows-based workload to AWS and needs the data to be available on a file system in the cloud. The company already has established an AWS Direct Connect connection between the on-premises network and AWS.
Which data migration strategy should the company use?

  • A. Use the file gateway option in AWS Storage Gateway to replace the existing Windows file server, and point the existing file share to the new file gateway.
  • B. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon FSx.
  • C. Use AWS Data Pipeline to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
  • D. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
masetromain
Highly Voted 2 years, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon FSx. D. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) are also valid options. They both use DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate the data between on-premises and cloud, the main difference is the type of file system in the cloud, Amazon FSx or Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
upvoted 17 times
rbm2023
2 years, 3 months ago
EFS only support Linux FS. this is why we need to go for FSx . option B
upvoted 27 times
Karamen
2 years ago
thanks for this explaination. > EFS only support Linux FS. this is why we need to go for FSx . option B
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
victorHugo
Highly Voted 1 year, 11 months ago
Selected Answer: A
For an and b we need FSx. Data Sync is useful for a batch and is able to process large data volumes. in (a) the data is also accessible from on prem. The data volume is quite small (5 GB) per day therefore (a) is feasible. In my opinion, the key requirement is "data to be available on a file system in the cloud" and ",, migrating workloads" and I think this includes that it can be accessed from servers on prem. In addition (a) replaces only a Windows File server and not the overall windows landscape in AWS. There I vote for (a), AWS Data Sync. See https://tutorialsdojo.com/aws-datasync-vs-storage-gateway/ for a comparison
upvoted 13 times
swadeey
1 year, 8 months ago
Correct point here is migration not daily sync and replication.
upvoted 3 times
...
vn_thanhtung
1 year, 11 months ago
needs the data to be available on a file system in the cloud
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Al8282
Most Recent 3 weeks, 3 days ago
Selected Answer: B
I had to pick B over A because it didn't specify "Fsx File Gateway" it just said "File Gateway" which is a separate product used to send data to S3 rather than a file system like Fsx File Gateway would do. Tricky one.
upvoted 1 times
...
princajen
1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the best match for Windows-based workloads. AWS DataSync can efficiently handle scheduled transfers, perfect for 5 GB/day. Ideal if the goal is daily replication/migration to make data available in AWS without requiring real-time syncing. Argument: File Gateway offers real-time access to data from both on-premises and cloud via caching. If immediate cloud access to on-premises files is needed, Amazon FSx File Gateway can serve as a bridge. Valid if the requirement is active hybrid access. But not a "data migration" strategy, it doesn't move data to the cloud, it fronts S3 of Fsx with a cache.
upvoted 1 times
...
0dc6cac
1 month, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Has to be A, it's the only option if you want data to be available on the cloud instantly. B does a daily sync, which means the data is outdated throughout the day
upvoted 1 times
...
0dc6cac
1 month, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Nothing suggests that we want to do a daily sync in the question. A makes more sense because the files will be always available to use from the cloud. In 99% of the cases that's better, and if it's the remaining 1%, they would have surely mentioned it in the question.
upvoted 1 times
...
happpieee
5 months ago
Selected Answer: B
DayaSync allows migration and continue access to both on-prem file server and FSx in a synchronised manner.
upvoted 1 times
0dc6cac
1 month, 3 weeks ago
but the data is synced daily, will be outdated throughout the day
upvoted 1 times
...
...
ParamD
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: A
A seem to be a more efficient solution as it eliminates duplicate storage. Storage gateway has to be FSx, which is implicit in this option.
upvoted 1 times
...
fbukevin
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Comparing A and B, finally I choosed B due to the "scheduling". In A, despite file gateway could provide or combine a scheduling function, B explicitly says that operation.
upvoted 1 times
...
Biden
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Workloads are only partially migrated which means data need to be accessed simultaneously by on-prem VMs and the already migrated VMs in cloud And we should assume that the data should be up to date all the time not just updated periodically Finally, File Gateway could be Amazon FSX File GW Hence clearly A.
upvoted 2 times
...
Tiger4Code
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
D is wrong cos EFS support only Linux File System
upvoted 2 times
...
toyaji
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Using Amazon FSx File Gateway, you can access data with low latency from on-premise and also in-cloud always. Why do you neet to batch datasync as like B?
upvoted 1 times
...
amministrazione
11 months, 3 weeks ago
B. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon FSx.
upvoted 1 times
...
8693a49
1 year ago
Selected Answer: A
Because part of the workloads have already been migrated we need a solution that keeps the data consistent between on prem and the cloud. With DataSync files stored by systems on-prem would be visible in the cloud only the following day. This could cause data inconsistencies and business disruption. The best solution is to use a file gateway to maintain files synchronised at all times. 5GBs/day is easily transferable over DX
upvoted 2 times
...
gfhbox0083
1 year, 1 month ago
B, for sure. Needs the data to be available on a file system in the cloud.
upvoted 1 times
...
mifune
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Windows file server -> FSx (cristal clear)
upvoted 1 times
...
Vongolatt
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
A is not the data migration
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...