Exam 300-620 topic 1 question 135 discussion

The Code F2044 error typically occurs when there is a mismatch or conflict in QoS policies applied to the L3Out configuration. To address this issue, a custom QoS policy should be created and applied directly to the L3Out interface. This ensures that the QoS settings align with the specific requirements of the traffic being handled. Why Not the Other Options? A. Acknowledge the QoS-related error: Acknowledging the error in the APIC GUI won't resolve the underlying configuration issue. The fault will persist until the QoS policy is corrected. B. Associate a custom QoS class: While associating a QoS class is part of the solution, you first need to create the custom QoS policy itself, which defines how the classes behave. D. Set the QoS policy to Level 3: Setting a QoS policy to a specific level (e.g., Level 3) may not align with your specific traffic requirements and won't address the root cause if a custom policy is needed.

1. Fault Lifecycle: The fault is marked as “Retaining”. This indicates that the system has recognized the issue but has not yet fully resolved it. 2. Cause: The cause is “resolution-failed”, specifically due to a missing QoS policy relation (qosDppPol-default). 3. Fault Type: It’s a configuration fault.

Life Cycle: Retaining, Severity: cleared - the fault will be deleted upon acknowledgement

It is A because the severity level is cleared. You need to acknowledge it in order to clear it before the retention timer expires.

Id say A. Because performing those actions will prevent the fault from appearing again in the future, but will not clear the fault that is already present.

or C? Create custom policy?

B is correct? https://pubhub.devnetcloud.com/media/apic-mim-ref-411/docs/FAULT-F2044.html the fault about missing-target so need to associate a new policy QoS?