Refer to the exhibit. An engineer must filter EIGRP updates that are received to block all 10.10.10.0/24 prefixes. The engineer tests the distribute list and finds one associated prefix. Which action resolves the issue?
A.
There is a permit in the ACL that allows this prefix into EIGRP. The ACL should be modified to deny 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0.
B.
There is a permit in the ACL that allows this prefix into EIGRP. The ACL should be modified to deny 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255.
C.
There is a permit in the route map that allows this prefix. A deny 20 statement is required with a match condition to match a new ACL that denies all prefixes.
D.
There is a permit in the route map that allows this prefix. A deny 20 statement is required with no match condition to block the prefix.
If they aim to filter 10.10.10.0/24, then I would expect to see something like this:
ip access-list standard EIGRP-FILTER
permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
route-map EIGRP deny 10
match ip address EIGRP-FILTER
route-map EIGRP permit 20
There is no valid answer of this one...
When you use a route-map in the acl you permit the traffic so that you match that traffic, then in the route-map you are going to configure what will be done to that traffic
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-410 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
HungarianDish_111
Highly Voted 2 years ago[Removed]
1 year, 5 months agointeldarvid
1 year, 10 months ago[Removed]
Most Recent 9 months, 4 weeks agoXBfoundX
10 months agodancott
1 year, 3 months agosasasan12345
2 years, 2 months agoTypovy
2 years, 2 months agoXerath
2 years, 1 month agoTypovy
2 years, 1 month ago