Refer to the exhibit. An engineer must design an address translation solution to provide internet connectivity for the corporate network. The design is restricted to the 172.16.168.0/22 subnet. Which solution must the engineer choose?
stateless NAT64 is 1:1 mapping and we have 2000 hosts, limited to a subnet /22 which equals to 1024-2 hosts, we need to use stateful NAT64 which is 1:* mapping
D Stateful Nat64 is correct. It cannot be stateless because stateless is for 1 to 1 mapping and a /22 only has 1,022 usable hosts which won't cover the 2000 IPv6 addresses.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/network-address-translation-nat/217208-understanding-nat64-and-its-configuratio.html
Stateless translation is appropriate when a NAT64 translator is used in front of IPv4-only servers to allow them to be reached by remote IPv6-only clients.
Stateful translation is suitable for deployment at the client side or at the service provider, allowing IPv6-only client hosts to reach remote IPv4-only nodes.
I believe the correct answer is B:
B. Stateless NAT64 - While not the ideal solution, this option could still provide some level of IPv6-to-IPv4 address translation. However, without maintaining session state, it may not properly support many-to-one address translations required for internet connectivity. Some applications and services might not work as expected, but it could potentially provide a basic level of connectivity between the IPv6 corporate network and the IPv4 internet.
I think A correct answer .
statefull nat64 - all subnet to do source nat with one public IP
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-420 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
nicolamazzoletti
7 months, 3 weeks agoakbntc
8 months agoLungful
8 months, 2 weeks agoLSLS55
6 months, 3 weeks agoCKL_SG
11 months, 3 weeks agoNickplayany
11 months, 3 weeks agoSpicyMochi
1 year agocerifyme85
1 year agocerifyme85
1 year agoted_ba
1 year agoted_ba
1 year ago