Option D suggests adding a second sequence in the route map with "permit 20." This would indeed permit routes for the 1.1.1.0/24 network, but the existing deny sequence (sequence number 10) is still present. In Cisco IOS route-maps, the first match is applied. Since the deny statement comes before the permit statement in the route-map, the deny will take precedence.
Therefore, even if you add a second sequence with "permit 20," the deny sequence with "deny 10" is still in effect, and the routes for 1.1.1.0/24 would continue to be denied.
To achieve the desired result of allowing routes for 1.1.1.0/24 while still filtering other routes, you need to modify the existing deny sequence to permit the desired network. Option B correctly suggests modifying the route-map to permit the access list instead of denying it, effectively allowing routes for 1.1.1.0/24.
wrong. "Which action restores the routes from neighbors while still filtering 1.1.1.0/24?" Wuestion wants to filter out 1.1.1.0/24 and allow other routes. We add sequence 20 to route map, with no match, to allow everything.
To restore the routes from neighbors while still filtering 1.1.1.0/24, you should modify the route-map to permit the routes instead of denying them. Therefore, the correct answer is:
B. Modify the route map to permit the access list instead of deny it.
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-410 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
[Removed]
Highly Voted 1 year, 10 months ago[Removed]
Most Recent 10 months, 1 week ago[Removed]
10 months, 2 weeks agoav3672
1 year, 6 months agobk989
1 year, 2 months agoav3672
1 year, 6 months ago