Refer to the exhibit. Routers R1, R2, R3, and R4 have been configured to run OSPF, and router R5 is running EIGRP. Traffic from R1 to R5 is expected to pass via R4, but OSPF routing has calculated the best path R3. Which action corrects the problem?
A.
Reconfigure R1 in Area 0
B.
Configure R3 to use metric-type 1 with a higher metric than R4
C.
Configure R1 with a static route to the R5 networks and set R5 as the next hop
EIGRP Metric Type 1 is preferred over Type 2
Traffic is expected to pass via R4, but because of the metric type configured, R3 is preferred. We can assume that traffic manipulation is already configured to prioritize R4.
If both R3 and R4 redistribute the EIGRP as E2 routes, how do we know that R4 will be a lower metric? It doesn't give us the details ospf costs on the R2 links.
Yes, but the most used link today is over 100mbit, so we maybe can assume the total cost for R1 to R3 is 2 using type 1.
And since E2 default redist eigrp as cost of 20.
The only possible solution i see with this limited info is tho redis eigrp with type one metric of 20 (higher than R3) would gives path via R3 22 and via R4 20.
Nvm, forgott E1 is prefered over E2.
Static wont work either, not r1 in a0 either.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-510 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Seele
9 months, 4 weeks agothejag
1 year, 4 months agoNC9337
1 year, 3 months agoNC9337
1 year, 3 months ago