A development team is considering options for implementing a new configuration management solution which must: • be agentless • utilize Python as a developing language • leverage YAML based workflows
At its core, Ansible operates in an “agentless” fashion. This means you’re freed from the hassle of installing and maintaining agent software on the nodes you manage. Simply put, all you need is SSH access, and you’re good to go. This simplicity is one of the cornerstones of Ansible’s broad appeal.
Yet Ansible’s human-readable declarative language, YAML, truly sets it apart. Users can quickly outline and execute complex tasks using playbooks—YAML scripts defining configurations and tasks. These playbooks provide a straightforward, structured method to represent automation workflows, making them easy to write and understand.
https://netboxlabs.com/blog/nornir-vs-ansible-how-to-choose/
Why not Nornir: Nornir is a Python library for managing network devices, not a complete configuration management solution. It wouldn't offer the full feature set needed by the development team.
C - Ansible
It is more suited then Nornir to leverage YAML based workflows.
upvoted 2 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-901 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
namashivaya
11 months agoluckymuki
1 year, 2 months ago3ca28d8
1 year, 3 months agoluckymuki
1 year, 2 months agoCh33s3y
1 year, 7 months ago