exam questions

Exam 300-710 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-710 exam

Exam 300-710 topic 1 question 276 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-710
Question #: 276
Topic #: 1
[All 300-710 Questions]

Remote users who connect via Cisco Secure Client to the corporate network behind a Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense device are reporting no audio on calls when calling between remote users using their softphones. These same users can call internal users on the corporate network without any issues. What is the cause of this issue?

  • A. The hairpinning feature is not available on Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
  • B. Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense needs a NAT policy that allows outside to outside communication
  • C. The Enable Spoke to Spoke Connectivity through Hub option is not selected on Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
  • D. Split tunneling is enabled for the Remote Access VPN on Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Bubu3k
Highly Voted 9 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Based on the following scenarios I'd be leaning more on B: -No audio on the call between an AnyConnect Client and an external number. -No audio on the call between an AnyConnect Client and another AnyConnect Client. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-v4x/220337-troubleshoot-common-anyconnect-communica.html
upvoted 7 times
d0980cc
3 weeks, 4 days ago
Bubu3k great find. Here's the one that pertains to FTD. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client/216180-troubleshoot-common-anyconnect-communica.html#anc8:~:text=check%20that%20the%20correct%20inbound%20and%20outbound%20interfaces%20configuration%20is%20in%20place
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Silexis
Most Recent 2 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Option B is wrong. When a VPN Client calls another VPN Client, there will be a P2P communication, so the first thing which is passing through my mind in HairPin or Spoke-to-Spoke communication. This means that traffic entering through the tunnel interface from one client, it will return to the same interface when calling the other client (an U-turn or hairpin). So, the command: same-security-traffic permit intra-interface .......is missing. This is why I will stick with A
upvoted 1 times
Silexis
2 months, 3 weeks ago
I can't delete this. In case of a Full Tunnel there is a Hairpin when calling between VPN clients but the answer says "it is not available" which is false. I have changed the answer to D - sorry for this
upvoted 1 times
...
Silexis
2 months, 4 weeks ago
Though, the wording "is not available" it might be wrong. (hate Cisco for such a bad wording) It might also be D where there is an Extended ACL for split tunneling and there are missing subnets - rendering host from subnet A cannot call host from subnet B. A full tunnel gateway wont suffer from this thing and only the Spoke-to-Spoke command has to be taken care of (I am running such a deployment on FTD and RAVPN and I don't have any NAT configured but the U-turn and indeed in full-tunnel mode and the Cisco Jabber calls are working just fine)
upvoted 1 times
...
...
ricckku
7 months, 1 week ago
A is the correct answer. The hair-pinning feature is definitely required. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client/215875-configure-anyconnect-vpn-client-on-ftd.html#toc-hId-1618727688
upvoted 2 times
...
aaInman
8 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Bubu3k is correct, "B" is the correct answer.
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago