Exam 350-401 topic 1 question 947 discussion

This is not a piece of code, this is a static XML, we see nothing about how/what is being executed here. weid question, I would answer B as a programmer.

Actually, a Loopback CAN be admin shut: Loopback0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down Tunnel0 10.100.100.2 YES NVRAM up up R20(config-if)# R20#sh ver | s Version Cisco IOS Software [Dublin], Linux Software (X86_64BI_LINUX-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 17.12.1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc5) Low quality Q in my opinion. <enable> would have to be <no shutdown>

Bad language.... One can't unshut something that can not be shutdown ever. loopback interface can't be shutdown , there is no need to unshut it, unless in CISCO vrsion of english being shut is the same as being disabled.....

<enabled>true</enabled> -> no shut

A is correct

A. It unshuts the loopback interface. The configuration indicates that the loopback interface is being enabled with <enabled>true</enabled>. In networking terms, particularly Cisco, "no shutdown" is the command used to enable an interface, which is equivalent to setting the enabled state to true. So, this would be the equivalent of "unshutting" the loopback interface. The snippet doesn't display, rename, or delete an interface; it configures it to be enable

I was mistaken: A. It unshuts the loopback interface. The <interface> element specifies the configuration of an interface. The <Loopback> element represents the loopback interface configuration. <name>100</name> specifies the name of the loopback interface, which is "100". <enabled>true</enabled> indicates that the loopback interface is enabled. The value "true" signifies that the interface is enabled. The provided XML code configures and enables a loopback interface with the name "100". This means that it unshuts (enables) the loopback interface.

In my humble view it is B, but I can be mistaken.