An engineer must perform a predictive design for a wireless network for location readiness and to mitigate interference. Which power level does the engineer use?
20 mW (â13 dBm) falls within the generally recommended â15â20 mWâ range for predictive/location-ready designs, so conceptually it isnât wildly off. However:
Ciscoâs best-practice guidance (and the examâs âgold-standardâ call-out) is 18 mW, because thatâs closest to matching a typical clientâs transmit power (~15 dBm) without overshooting and enlarging your cell radius.
Rounding up to 20 mW (choice C) would work in most real-world surveys, but it gives you slightly larger overlap cellsâso the exam deems 18 mW (choice B) the âmore accurateâ answer.
In short: C isnât strictly wrong in practice, but B is the precise, exam-correct figure.
For predictive-design site planning with location readiness (i.e. fingerprinting) and to keep cell sizes small (mitigating co-channel interference), Cisco recommends using an AP transmit power that roughly matches a clientâs transmit powerâ18 mW. At that level you get:
Good overlap between adjacent AP cells for accurate location fingerprint collection
Limited cell radius, which keeps co-channel interference down in dense deployments
The other options donât strike that balance:
10 mW (A) is generally too low to guarantee reliable coverage for fingerprinting.
20 mW (C) is close, but the published best practice calls out 18 mW specifically.
50 mW (D) produces overly large cells, increasing adjacency overlap and interference.
The correct answer is:
A. 10 mW
For location readiness and interference mitigation, the recommended power level is typically 10 mW because:
It provides a more consistent and accurate representation of client device power levels, which are usually lower than AP maximum output.
Using 10 mW reduces the risk of excessive cell overlap and co-channel interference, leading to better location accuracy.
It ensures a balanced coverage area, essential for accurate location tracking and minimal interference.
When you check the signal coverage, verify that the AP radio transmit power does not use a transmit power greater than what the client devices can support.
For example, by default, the Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7925G uses the highest available transmit power by default (17 dBm / 50 mW for 2.4 GHz and 16 dBm / 40 mW for 5 GHz).
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/116057-site-survey-guidelines-wlan-00.html
Read this Chapter 5. Applying Wireless Design Requirements
As you perform a survey, try to keep the AP power reduced to half that of the maximum transmit power you expect to find in any client. This will provide a margin or buffer that you can leverage if you need to adjust any AP transmit power levels, while staying within the capabilities of most client devices.
the recommendation is to keep the AP power reduced to half of the maximum transmit power expected for client devices. This approach helps in providing flexibility for power adjustments and avoids interference, while ensuring compatibility with most client devices.
Assuming typical client device transmit powers (such as 20â30 mW), a power level around 10 mW (option A) would be appropriate, as it represents half of a typical clientâs maximum transmit power and provides a suitable margin to manage interference and maintain location accuracy.
Correct answer: A. 10 mW
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-425 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Abbribas
1Â month, 2Â weeks agoAbbribas
1Â month, 2Â weeks agorlss92
4Â months, 1Â week agoJonycici
8Â months, 1Â week agoFarhad123
8Â months, 1Â week agoJonycici
8Â months, 1Â week agoalbiprx
12Â months agoalbiprx
1Â year ago