ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Cisco Discussions
exam questions

Exam 300-620 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-620 exam
Go to Exam

Exam 300-620 topic 1 question 177 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-620
Question #: 177
Topic #: 1
[All 300-620 Questions]



Refer to the exhibit. An administrator configures inter-VRF route leaking between Production:vrf-prod and Non-Production:vrf-nonprod. However, the route in the Non-Production:vrf-nonprod VRF to the production tenant is missing. Which action resolves the VRF route leaking issue?

  • A. Change the contract scope to Global.
  • B. Enable the Shared between VRFs option for the BD subnet in the production VRF.
  • C. Enable the Shared between VRFs option for the EPG subnet in the non-production VRF.
  • D. Export the contract from provider to consumer tenant.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
by prospio971 at Feb. 5, 2025, 3:10 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
prospio971
3 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
In Cisco ACI, inter-VRF route leaking requires specific configurations to ensure that routes are shared between VRFs. The issue described indicates that the route from the production VRF (vrf-prod) is missing in the non-production VRF (vrf-nonprod). To resolve this, the Shared between VRFs option must be enabled for the Bridge Domain (BD) subnet in the production VRF.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago