ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Cisco Discussions
exam questions

Exam 300-425 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-425 exam
Go to Exam

Exam 300-425 topic 1 question 203 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-425
Question #: 203
Topic #: 1
[All 300-425 Questions]

An engineer created a design where the HQ has a Cisco 5520 Wireless LAN Controller with 2000 APs associated to it. If a controller at one of the remote sites fails, the APs at that site fall back to a central controller. Global AP Failover Priority must be enabled. Which design approach must be taken to prevent the critical APs at HQ from going down and still allow APs to failover to the HQ controller?

  • A. Set all the APs at HQ to a failover priority of "high" and set the remote site APs to "normal".
  • B. Set all the APs at HQ to a failover priority of "medium" and set the remote site APs to "high".
  • C. Ensure that the critical APs at HQ have a failover priority of "critical", leave the rest of the HQ APs at "medium", and set the remote site APs to "high".
  • D. Create an access list on the HQ router that blocks CAPWAP discovery on UDP port 5246 so that the remote APs cannot kick off the APs at HQ.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️
by Farhad123 at Feb. 6, 2025, 9:47 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
55f2ace
2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
The highest priority is critical
upvoted 1 times
...
Farhad123
3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
The question is asking what we should do to ensure that the critical APs at the HQ have priority while allowing other APs to connect to the HQ controller in case their own controller fails. This is simple: all critical APs at the HQ should be assigned the highest priority, which is "Critical". Now, we are left with two groups of APs: Non-critical APs at the HQ APs at the remote site If we assign the second-highest priority ("High") to the remaining HQ APs, then the controller might reach full capacity, leaving the remote site APs without a failover option if their own controller fails. Therefore, the second priority should be assigned to the remote site APs, and the lowest priority should be assigned to the non-critical APs at the HQ
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago