exam questions

Exam 350-501 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 350-501 exam

Exam 350-501 topic 1 question 95 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 350-501
Question #: 95
Topic #: 1
[All 350-501 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit Which effect of this configuration is true?

  • A. The two routers fail to form a neighbor relationship because they have different IS-IS area types.
  • B. The two routers successfully form a neighbor relationship.
  • C. The two routers fail to form a neighbor relationship because the authentication configuration is missing.
  • D. The two routers fail to form a neighbor relationship because their system IDs are different.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Onny
Highly Voted 3 years, 10 months ago
Correct Answer is A. The two routers fail to form a neighbor relationship because they have different IS-IS area types. Router Type L1 with L1/2 successfully form Adjacency if Area Id Matches, else no Adjacency
upvoted 31 times
...
MRasul18
Highly Voted 3 years, 8 months ago
Correct answer is A They should have the same area ID.
upvoted 12 times
...
thejag
Most Recent 11 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: A
Let me explain something: "The last two numbers of the NET are the NSEL; they are always 00 on a router. The next 12 numbers (separated into 3 groups of 4 numbers) are the system ID. On Cisco routers, the system ID is always this length—6 bytes. Anything to the left of the system ID is the area ID." "System ID—This field is 6 octets long and immediately follows the area address. When the IS operates at Level 1, the system ID must be unique among all the Level-1 devices in the same area. When the IS operates at Level 2, the system ID must be unique among all devices in the domain." https://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=101756
upvoted 1 times
...
craterman
2 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is correct. B is incorrect. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/200293-IS-IS-Adjacency-and-Area-Types.html
upvoted 2 times
...
EdgardoAC
2 years, 5 months ago
Seems even after 1 years this question is heavily debated. I can say with complete certainty that A is correct. From a lab I present the following debug output. R1#debug isis adj-packets IS-IS Adjacency related packets debugging is on for router process null *Dec 10 20:50:30.367: ISIS-Adj: Rec L2 IIH from 5000.0004.0000 (GigabitEthernet0/0), cir type L1L2, cir id 1111.1111.1112.01, length 1497, ht(30) *Dec 10 20:50:30.367: ISIS-Adj: is-type mismatch *Dec 10 20:50:30.571: ISIS-Adj: Rec L1 IIH from 5000.0004.0000 (GigabitEthernet0/0), cir type L1L2, cir id 1111.1111.1112.01, length 1497, ht(30) *Dec 10 20:50:30.571: ISIS-Adj: Area mismatch, level 1 IIH on GigabitEthernet0/0 *Dec 10 20:50:32.341: ISIS-Adj: Sending L1 LAN IIH on GigabitEthernet0/0, length 1497
upvoted 1 times
...
Cprest
2 years, 7 months ago
One of the most debated questions. at first glance option "A" seems correct, but the question says, different IS-IS area types. Router Type L1 with L1/2 successfully form Adjacency if System ID area Matches. option D says, system IDs are different. R1 System ID area - 0012 R2 System ID area - 0022 The answer correct is D I came to this conclusion, testing in a Lab.
upvoted 3 times
ENTJ
9 months, 1 week ago
This is very wrong because System ID has to be unique, they cannot match. Only the Area # needs to match for Level 1.
upvoted 1 times
ENTJ
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Let me correct myself. System ID only has to be unique when they are in the same Area #. Since the area# is different, it doesn't even matter if system ID is the same or not.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
tinte
2 years, 8 months ago
A is correct. *Mar 1 00:18:10.739: ISIS-Adj: Sending L2 LAN IIH on FastEthernet0/0, length 1497 R2# *Mar 1 00:18:13.667: ISIS-Adj: Rec L1 IIH from c401.1cc5.0000 (FastEthernet0/0), cir type L1, cir id 1111.1111.1111.01, length 1497 *Mar 1 00:18:13.667: ISIS-Adj: Area mismatch, level 1 IIH on FastEthernet0/0 *Mar 1 00:18:13.747: ISIS-Adj: Sending L1 LAN IIH on FastEthernet0/0, length 1497 R2#
upvoted 1 times
...
JC2R
2 years, 10 months ago
All options are incorrect, but the most close to an answer is A.
upvoted 3 times
...
serban_17
2 years, 10 months ago
Correct is A. To form a L1 adj two routers MUST be in the same area.
upvoted 3 times
...
Net_Dio
2 years, 10 months ago
OMG... before you say the answer is B based on Cisco documentation of L1L2 can form an adjacency with L1... the same rule as OSPF applies, you have to be in the same area... read the rest of the document before you just pull that bit of information. The CLNS ID or what they call the system ID says what area it belongs, they don't match 12 and 22 are not the same.
upvoted 1 times
...
beenardino
2 years, 11 months ago
B is correct And I quote the technical document from Cisco: "A Level 1 router can become adjacent with the Level 1 and Level 1-2 (L1/L2) router. A Level 2 router can become adjacent with Level 2 or Level 1-2 (L1/L2) router. There is no adjacency between L1 only and L2 only router." https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/200293-IS-IS-Adjacency-and-Area-Types.html
upvoted 2 times
[Removed]
2 years, 10 months ago
I'm sorry, you are wrong. You may need to put some more research into this topic. R1 is configured to form an L1 adjacency only. As per the "technical documentation" you have provided "L1 Adjacency if Area ID Matches, else no Adjacency" you can quite clearly see here that the Area ID does not match between these routers (R1 Area - 0012, R2 Area - 0022). If R1 had been configured 'is-type L1/L2' (which is the default) an L2 adjacency would form, but this is not the case... Therefor A is the answer, no adjacency will form.
upvoted 2 times
...
FoggiestIE
2 years, 11 months ago
An L1 can form an adjacency with an L1L2, but they must have a common area this example doesn’t
upvoted 2 times
...
...
nolbi
3 years, 4 months ago
B is Correct. This is a connection between 2 areas with an Level 1 Type. https://sites.google.com/site/amitsciscozone/home/is-is/is-is-areas
upvoted 1 times
[Removed]
3 years, 4 months ago
You can NOT form a level 1 adjacency between two different IS-IS areas, this would require a Level 2 Backbone Adjacency for Inter-area Area. Level 1 Adjacency is only for Intra-area. R1 is configured for Level 1 only and both routers have different Area IDs.
upvoted 6 times
...
...
Jjsa1994
3 years, 5 months ago
correct answer is B. area types are L1 and L1/L2 they can form neighborship on that, so A is incorrect
upvoted 1 times
[Removed]
3 years, 4 months ago
Hi! Sorry the correct answer is A, R1 & R2 will not be able to form an Adjacency as R1 is configured for Level 1 only and both routers have different Area IDs. R1 Area ID - 0012 R2 Area ID - 0022
upvoted 8 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago