An engineer is setting up overlapping VPNs to allow VRF ABC and XYZ to communicate with VRF CENTRAL but wants to make sure that VRF ABC and XYZ cannot communicate. Which configuration accomplishes these objectives? A. B. C. D.
100% Correct Answer is A
Concept in Route target is very simple "export in VRF1 equal import in VRF2" and visa versa
- IMPORT-RT in ABC must not equal EXPORT RT in XYZ and visa versa
- IMPORT RT in (ABC,XYZ) must equal EXPORT RT in CENTRAL and visa versa IMPORT-RT in Central equal EXPORT-RT in (ABC,XYZ)
I still think its B heres why:
Central VRF keeps it seperated by not communicating back to the same imports of ABC and XYZ.
Using that knowledge Answer A and Answer D is eliminated. C just doesnt make sense.
Agree that answer is A, that is the only configuration that achieves the desired effect.
Option B, VRF XYX Exports both 65000:1111 and 65000:2222, which means that VRF ABC imports RT 65000:1111, then it would receive VRF XYZ routes as well.
upvoted 6 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-501 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Onny
Highly Voted 2 years, 11 months agoZahraa
Highly Voted 2 years, 11 months agoAlirezaNetWorld
Most Recent 9 months, 4 weeks agoCprest
1 year, 8 months agoNet_Dio
1 year, 11 months agoAjccieit
2 years agobeenardino
2 years agobeenardino
2 years agoMahalasmi
2 years, 1 month agofukJUNIPER
2 years, 2 months agoibrahv
2 years, 4 months agoJjsa1994
2 years, 6 months agoEdgardoAC
2 years, 7 months ago