exam questions

Exam 300-410 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-410 exam

Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 5 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-410
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibits. The output of the trace route from R5 shows a loop in the network.
Which configuration prevents this loop?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Deadliftn
Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months ago
Answer is A but the available answers are all written wrong either way. Whoever wrote this is crazy. But, the CLOSEST possible answer would be A. Whoever writes questions for the Cisco exams are absolutely ignorant in how they write questions OR they are being deliberate in trying to fool the test takers, which is sad.
upvoted 21 times
Koume
2 years, 4 months ago
After a thoght analysis is not B, Il explain Why, R3 are redistributing OSPF into EIGRP and setting the tag 1, but notice that the tag 1 is being announced on EIGRP process, when R4 redistribute OSPF into EIGRP with the route map it will not match anything because that tag is no been announce by ospf process. So on R4 the R1 network will be redistributed back and being announced to R2, as the reported distance reset by redistribution then when packet arrives to R2 the R4 router will be prefered. In conclusion B is not Correct, the most closest is A
upvoted 6 times
net_eng10021
1 year, 7 months ago
I see the same thing as Koume has described above. The network is not tagged in the ospf domain.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
HungarianDish_111
Highly Voted 1 year, 11 months ago
"A" I have redone this lab. Introduced the loop, then applied solution "A". It did actually prevented the loop. Before applying "A": R5#trac 10.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.1.1.1 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.1.35.3 2 msec 1 msec 2 msec 2 10.1.23.2 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec 3 10.1.24.4 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec 4 10.1.45.5 1 msec 2 msec 2 msec 5 10.1.35.3 3 msec 2 msec 2 msec 6 10.1.23.2 3 msec 2 msec 3 msec 7 10.1.24.4 3 msec 3 msec 3 msec 8 10.1.45.5 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec 9 10.1.35.3 4 msec 3 msec 3 msec 10 10.1.23.2 3 msec 4 msec 4 msec <output ommited> After applying "A": R5#trac 10.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.1.1.1 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.1.35.3 2 msec 2 msec 1 msec 2 10.1.23.2 2 msec 2 msec 2 msec 3 10.1.12.1 2 msec * 2 msec R5#
upvoted 16 times
HungarianDish_111
1 year, 11 months ago
Prefix is tagged: R4#sh ip route 10.1.1.1 Routing entry for 10.1.1.0/24 Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20 Tag 1, type extern 2, forward metric 2 Redistributing via eigrp 1 R4#sh run | sec router eigrp router eigrp 1 network 10.1.24.0 0.0.0.255 redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000000 1 255 1 1500 route-map FILTER-TAG R4# R4#sh run | sec route-map redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000000 1 255 1 1500 route-map FILTER-TAG route-map FILTER-TAG deny 10 match tag 1 route-map FILTER-TAG permit 20
upvoted 1 times
...
HungarianDish_111
1 year, 11 months ago
Before applying "A" - 10.1.1.0/24 is learned from OSPF: R4#sh ip eigrp 1 top 10.1.1.0/24 | sec External Composite metric is (2816/0), route is External External data: AS number of route is 1 External protocol is OSPF, external metric is 20 Administrator tag is 1 (0x00000001) After applying "A" - tagged ospf routes are filtered, 10.1.1.0/24 is learned from redistribute connected via eigrp: R4#sh ip eigrp 1 top 10.1.1.0/24 | sec External Composite metric is (131072/130816), route is External External data: AS number of route is 0 External protocol is Connected, external metric is 0 Administrator tag is 0 (0x00000000)
upvoted 3 times
HungarianDish_111
1 year, 11 months ago
Before applying solution A, R2 sees two redistributed routes in eigrp, one from redistribute connected, and another from redistribute ospf. R2 trusts ospf more, and sends traffic to R4. Loop is created.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
Sammy3637
Most Recent 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Answer is A ,just did the lab Tracing the route to 10.1.1.1 1 10.1.35.3 20 msec 32 msec 28 msec 2 10.1.23.2 56 msec 64 msec 60 msec 3 10.1.24.4 96 msec 100 msec 96 msec 4 10.1.45.5 56 msec 60 msec 68 msec 5 10.1.35.3 88 msec 96 msec 92 msec 6 10.1.23.2 124 msec 116 msec 128 msec 7 10.1.24.4 160 msec 152 msec 148 msec 8 10.1.45.5 128 msec 128 msec 128 msec 9 10.1.35.3 160 msec 156 msec 148 msec 10 10.1.23.2 184 msec 196 msec 180 msec 11 10.1.24.4 216 msec 220 msec 220 msec 12 10.1.45.5 184 msec 188 msec 188 msec 13 10.1.35.3 204 msec 236 msec 200 msec after applying A 1 10.1.35.3 16 msec 36 msec 32 msec 2 10.1.23.2 60 msec 64 msec 56 msec 3 10.1.12.1 104 msec 100 msec 92 msec
upvoted 2 times
...
LanreDipeolu
6 months ago
After careful examination of the contested answers. A is the appropiriate answer because one cannot redistribute into eigrp without specifying the metrics. So B cannot be the answr.
upvoted 2 times
...
davdtech
8 months ago
seriously ? redistribute ospf into eigrp on both router 3 and 4 ? Nahh Its A
upvoted 1 times
...
Sheet
8 months ago
A is the correct answer. The reason for the loop is that R2 is forwarding the packets destined to 10.1.1.1 to R4, instead of R1. This is because in the redistribute OSPF statement, BW metric has a higher value and delay has a value of 1. So, R2 chooses R4 over R1 for 10.1.1.0/24 subnet causing a loop. Now, R5 learns 10.1.1.0/24 from R3 and advertises the same route to R4, that R4 redistributes back in EIGRP. If R3 sets a tag of 1 while redistributing EIGRP in OSPF, and R4 denies all the OSPF routes with tag 1 while redistributing, it will not advertise 10.1.1.0/24 back into EIGRP. Hence, the loop will be broken.
upvoted 6 times
...
bk989
9 months ago
The answe is A. I have my CCIE written certification. Please refer to Hungarian Dish Comment.
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
10 months, 1 week ago
A is correct we must permit tag 1 on R3 and dney it on R4
upvoted 2 times
...
KZM
1 year ago
Option A is the solution.
upvoted 2 times
...
edson91
1 year, 1 month ago
We are redistributing an OSPF subnet to EIGRP, so you need to go to EIGRP and issue the OSPF redistribution inside EIGRP. Answer is A, no debate is needed. Just look how the configuration is being applied and save your time.
upvoted 2 times
...
MasoudGhorbani
1 year, 2 months ago
Answer is A. To stop routing loops when mixing EIGRP and OSPF, we use route tagging and filtering. when a router sends routes from one type of routing (like EIGRP) into another (like OSPF), it adds a special tag to those routes. This tag is like a note that says, 'Hey, I came from EIGRP!' Then, when another router is moving routes back from OSPF into EIGRP, it looks for that tag. If it sees the tag, it knows not to send those routes back into EIGRP again. This way, we avoid having routes go in circles, causing loops. if router R3 is moving routes from EIGRP to OSPF, it tags them. Then, R4, which is moving routes the other way, blocks any routes with that tag from going back into EIGRP. So, R3 tags the EIGRP routes with a '1' when sending them to OSPF, and R4 makes sure not to let any routes with a '1' tag back into EIGRP.
upvoted 2 times
...
net_eng10021
1 year, 7 months ago
I like A here. The problem with B is that the 10.1.1.0/24 subnet is not getting tagged on the eigrp to ospf redistribution at R3. Hence, R4, can't block it from on the ospf to eigrp redistribution at R4.
upvoted 3 times
...
Mohammad963
1 year, 8 months ago
I'll go with A, 100% .
upvoted 4 times
...
LanreDipeolu
1 year, 8 months ago
B is the correct answer from the fact that R4 advertised the important route of 10.1.24.4, which other options did not. Also technically set tag1 in R3 and denied it in R4.
upvoted 1 times
XBfoundX
1 year, 4 months ago
no is not, in eigrp you need to specify the K values for redistribution otherwise the routes will be redistributed with infinite metric which means they are not valuable routes. EIGRP needs the K values because it does not have an active algorithm like ospf but is just a formula using by default bandwith and delay.
upvoted 2 times
XBfoundX
1 year, 4 months ago
ok I have read half of it please ignore my comment LanreDipeolu
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Chiaretta
1 year, 9 months ago
The right answer is A.
upvoted 2 times
...
inteldarvid
1 year, 10 months ago
100%% option "A"
upvoted 2 times
...
HungarianDish_111
1 year, 12 months ago
For me also "A" seems to be the closest, because it is applying the tag on the correct combination of protocol & router. I labbed this scenario in CML, but I was unable to reproduce a loop with this configuration.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago