exam questions

Exam 350-501 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 350-501 exam

Exam 350-501 topic 1 question 126 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 350-501
Question #: 126
Topic #: 1
[All 350-501 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. When implementing an LDP protocol, an engineer experienced an issue between two directly connected routers and noticed that no LDP neighbor exists for 1.1.1.1.
Which factor should be the reason for this situation?

  • A. LDP needs to be enabled on the R2 loopback interface.
  • B. LDP needs to be enabled on the R2 physical interface.
  • C. R2 does not see any hellos from R1.
  • D. R2 sees the wrong type of hellos from R1.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
costascarramanlis
Highly Voted 4 years, 2 months ago
Correct is B. It is not C because in the section Discovery Sources there are no interfaces shown.
upvoted 17 times
nolbi
4 years, 1 month ago
I think you are right. https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/us/docs/2016/pdf/BRKMPL-3124.pdf Page: 23 There is no "recv" flag.
upvoted 5 times
...
...
Net_Dio
Highly Voted 3 years, 7 months ago
The answer is B.. you have to have a transport IP which is the interface that is used to actually send the hellos. You are configured with a targeted session but MPLS is not passing on the interface, that's why it will show you sending hellos but it's not FORWARDING them.
upvoted 6 times
...
picho707
Most Recent 8 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Discovered sources is blank.
upvoted 1 times
...
cerifyme85
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Router(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp disc det Local LDP Identifier: 2.2.2.2:0 Discovery Sources: Targeted Hellos: 2.2.2.2 -> 1.1.1.1 (ldp): active/passive, xmit/recv Hello interval: 10000 ms; Transport IP addr: 2.2.2.2 LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0; no host route to transport addr Src IP addr: 1.1.1.1; Transport IP addr: 1.1.1.1 Hold time: 90 sec; Proposed local/peer: 90/15 sec Reachable via 0.0.0.0/0 Password: not required, none, in use
upvoted 1 times
cerifyme85
1 year, 4 months ago
Before session protection Router(config)#do sh mpls ldp disc det Local LDP Identifier: 2.2.2.2:0 Discovery Sources: Interfaces: GigabitEthernet0/0 (ldp): xmit/recv Enabled: Interface config Hello interval: 5000 ms; Transport IP addr: 2.2.2.2 LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0; no host route to transport addr Src IP addr: 172.16.0.1; Transport IP addr: 1.1.1.1 Hold time: 15 sec; Proposed local/peer: 15/15 sec Reachable via 0.0.0.0/0 Password: not required, none, in use Clients: IPv4 Targeted Hellos: 2.2.2.2 -> 1.1.1.1 (ldp): active/passive, xmit/recv Hello interval: 10000 ms; Transport IP addr: 2.2.2.2 LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0; no host route to transport addr Src IP addr: 1.1.1.1; Transport IP addr: 1.1.1.1 Hold time: 90 sec; Proposed local/peer: 90/90 sec Reachable via 0.0.0.0/0 Password: not required, none, in use
upvoted 1 times
cerifyme85
1 year, 4 months ago
After session Protection Router(config-if)#do sh mpls ldp disc det Local LDP Identifier: 2.2.2.2:0 Discovery Sources: Targeted Hellos: 2.2.2.2 -> 1.1.1.1 (ldp): active/passive, xmit/recv Hello interval: 10000 ms; Transport IP addr: 2.2.2.2 LDP Id: 1.1.1.1:0; no host route to transport addr Src IP addr: 1.1.1.1; Transport IP addr: 1.1.1.1 Hold time: 90 sec; Proposed local/peer: 90/15 sec Reachable via 0.0.0.0/0 Password: not required, none, in use
upvoted 1 times
cerifyme85
1 year, 4 months ago
Sorry I meant "After session protect" and mpls ip disabled on R2 interface
upvoted 1 times
...
...
cerifyme85
1 year, 4 months ago
Sorry I meant "After session protect" and mpls ip enabled on interface
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
stratosph3re
2 years, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Just replicated in GNS fellas. MPLS LDP needs to be configured in R2's physical i/f towards R1.
upvoted 3 times
...
EdgardoAC
3 years, 1 month ago
Sure R2 is not receiving hellos, so C sounds good. But WHY is R2 not receiving hellos, because LDP is not enabled on any physical interface. You can see in the output the discovery sources are blank. So B is a better answer than C.
upvoted 6 times
...
Abdol1987
3 years, 2 months ago
I hate this question but see makes more sense to me
upvoted 1 times
...
jefranca
3 years, 3 months ago
I tested in EVE-NG. It's really C. The CLI output is the same
upvoted 2 times
...
rans3001
3 years, 7 months ago
Just to bring more confusion... The output shows that R2 does not have MPLS enabled on any interface, or MPLS enabled interface is shutdown (tested in the lab), so not 100% B. We can see that R2 have a configured targeted LDP to R1. The basic reason for LDP session not being up on R2 is because it didn't receive any hello from R1. Targeted LDP just needs both ends to be configured and pure IP connectivity between ends. Any comments ?
upvoted 3 times
fuko135
3 years, 6 months ago
To not see hello is secondary reason. Root cause is mpls is not enabled on interface
upvoted 4 times
...
...
serban_17
3 years, 7 months ago
B is correct, I've just labbed it.
upvoted 5 times
...
rokk_cm
3 years, 8 months ago
xmit ⇒ transmit. So R2 is transmitting hellos, but is not receiving any. So the correct answer is C
upvoted 3 times
...
Barakikaki
4 years, 3 months ago
Correct answer is c, R2 sending hellos but not receiving any.
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...