But the question is about SD-WAN.
I think you can go with the "I don't care what they ask, I will answer what is think" approach, but don't think is very efficient.
The Vedge router configuration guide shows explicitly how to allow VPN to VPN communication - https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/routing/vEdge-20-x/routing-book/m-routing-leaking-for-service-sharing.html#Cisco_Concept.dita_037b791c-e340-491a-a74c-09c973301991
Its annoying they use VN instead of VPN to try and throw you off.
THE ANSWER IS D
Fabric Routers are used in SD-Access not SD-WAN, This eliminates answer A.
Fabric Edges are also used in SD-Access so that eliminates that question as well.
The other answer makes no sense.
The answer is D: You can do Route leaking to talk between VN
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/routing/ios-xe-17/routing-book-xe/m-routing-leaking-for-service-sharing.html
Lets' Gooo i was able to find it.
CORRECT ANSWER IS D !!!!!!!!
In an SD-WAN (Software-Defined Wide Area Network) architecture, route leaking is a common technique used to allow overlay Virtual Networks (VNs) to communicate with each other. Route leaking involves selectively sharing or injecting routes from one VN to another, thereby enabling traffic to flow between the isolated VNs.
Key points about route leaking in an SD-WAN architecture:
Fabric Border Nodes: Route leaking typically occurs at the border nodes of the SD-WAN fabric. These nodes are responsible for connecting the overlay VNs to external networks.
ALSO: FABRIC ROUTERS ARE USED ON SD-ACCESS NOT SD-WAN !! BE CAREFUL
My thoughts on this one:
GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) tunneling can also be used to enable communication between overlay VNs in some network designs. By configuring GRE tunnels between the fabric edge devices, traffic from one VN can be sent through the tunnel to another VN, enabling inter-VN communication.
However, option A, which involves using external fusion routers to map VNs to VRFs and selectively route traffic between VRFs, is a more common approach in SD-WAN architectures. It offers greater flexibility and control for policy-based routing, whereas GRE tunneling may require manual configuration and maintenance of tunnels, which can be more complex and less scalable in large deployments.
So, while both options A and B can be used to enable communication between overlay VNs, option A is more common and generally more suitable for SD-WAN architectures.
according to ENSLD cert guide Page 335
any communication between endpoints in different VNs must go through a fusion router or firewall
and VNs belong to SD-Access. not SD-WAN
i will do more reasearch about this one but how i see things:
we are speaking about sd-wan not sda access. first hing that comes in my mind is gre & ipsec. for the moment i will go with gre and ip sex. i will let you know if i find anything else
The CCNP Enterprise Design ENSLD 300-420 Official Cert Guide mentions, "A Fusion router is used to allow endpoints in different VNs to communicate with each other", it also states "vEdge routers are responsible for establishing the network fabric and forwarding traffic; they bring up IPsec and GRE tunnels between sites...vEdge routers establish a control channel to vSmart controllers and IPsec tunnels to other vEdge devices to form the overlay network". If I understand correctly, I think "vEdge Routers" do the mapping of VN's to VRF's not "Fusion Routers". Fusion Routers acts as the next-hop to a VN. I'm swayed towards "B" as the correct answer.
I'm getting crazy with this one. Why every single supplier says GRE tunnels - it's by far more sensible A (External Fusion router) - I'm taking the test tomorrow - can anyone clarify please?
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-420 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
goku2020
Highly Voted 3 years, 11 months agoBW1001
3 years agocryptonite
2 years, 8 months agoEmily23
1 year, 4 months agoBuffering
Most Recent 6 months, 3 weeks agosalmarin
9 months, 4 weeks agoakbntc
1 year, 1 month agoClauster
1 year, 2 months agoClauster
1 year, 2 months agoClauster
1 year, 3 months agoClauster
1 year, 2 months agoSpicyMochi
1 year, 6 months agoandrewChan
2 years agosonicwarrior
2 years, 3 months agopython_tamer
2 years, 5 months agocwoolie
2 years, 7 months agoroganjosh
2 years, 8 months agoXavi07
3 years, 3 months ago[Removed]
3 years, 7 months agoRanx01
3 years, 9 months agoluisjuradoledesma
3 years, 9 months agocwoolie
2 years, 7 months ago