I believe the answer is 3: If we take a look to the oficial Cisco Yang Model Library: https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/vendor/cisco/xe
The below models do exist:
Cisco-IOS-XE-native.yang
Cisco-IOS-XE-ntp.yang
Cisco-IOS-XE-ntp-oper.yang
So somehow the NETCONF <get> must interact with them.
Leveraged Multiple AI to get to the bottom of this. There are 3 models referenced.
Cisco-IOS-XE-native: Handles general native configurations.
Cisco-IOS-XE-ntp: Manages NTP server configurations.
Cisco-IOS-XE-ntp-oper: Deals with operational data for NTP.
The server section within the <native> element is not a separate model; it is part of the same YANG model. In the given XML, the <server> section is nested within the <native> model namespace, which means it is an extension or a component of the Cisco-IOS-XE-native YANG model.
To clarify, here is the structure:
Cisco-IOS-XE-native: This YANG model includes the <native> element and all its nested elements, including <ntp> and <server>.
Cisco-IOS-XE-ntp-oper: This is a separate YANG model that deals with operational data related to NTP.
Thus, the <get> operation interacts with these two distinct YANG models.
The correct answer is:
B. two
You can still interact with oper modules. You can <get> them just like you can <get> any other module. Technically, this is considered an interaction, and as such, 3 is likely the correct answer.
3. Agreed. Check here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6020
"All YANG definitions are specified within a module that is bound to a
particular XML namespace [XML-NAMES], which is a globally unique URI
[RFC3986]. A NETCONF client or server uses the namespace during XML
encoding of data."
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-435 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
B3nd3cida
Highly Voted 3 years, 8 months agoNetWizard
Highly Voted 3 years agossink19
Most Recent 4 months, 3 weeks agodkhenderson2
7 months agosquirrel88x
8 months agofuhgeddaboudit
1 year, 4 months agojas26says
2 years, 4 months agomattlarette
1 year, 4 months agoJCGO
3 years, 5 months ago_rfissa_
3 years, 9 months agoBoot20
3 years, 9 months ago1234567J
3 years, 11 months ago