Exam 200-301 topic 1 question 55 discussion

B & C are correct!

E is not quite that wrong. If not the private adresses, there would be less adresses overall to use, so it would increase the chance of someone assigning address that is already in use. By using private IPs, there is no chance, someone assigns diplicate public address inside LAN cuz there is a special IP scope for that. Therefore I would say B&E. C is like yes and no. 0 is always less that something grater than it, but here it suggests that privates costs something which is wrong.

B & E are the best options for the question asked. A and D are apparently wrong. B. Correct, because private IPs do not cost money, while public IPs need to be purchased from ISP. E. The same IP address can be used in multiple private networks without causing conflicts. This is actually a purpose of NAT. C. Incorrect, because you can assign public IPs to devices if they have no connections to the internet. For example, in an isolated lab environment, you can assign any IPs (except special addresses like network ID, broadcast, multicast) to devices, and they can function well within the environment.

B&C is the correct answer, but gosh, the wording is terrible; private IPv4 addresses are FREE to use.

A. Incorrect - Private IPv4 addresses are not routable. B. Private addresses can be used without the need for getting it from the ISP by paying for it. c. They can be assigned to devices where connecting to internet is not necessary. d. To my knowledge NAT translations are needed to communicate over internet when devices in our LAN are using private addresses. e. We can use duplicate private addresses over different networks nut not in a same LAN.

idk I think these are right

Definitely C. I'm actually considering D as my second answer as using ONLY private IPv4 addresses for off-grid operations does not need any NAT, therefore eliminating the necessity for it?

B & C, E isn't correct because Private IP addresses alone don't prevent duplicate IP conflicts. It's actually the use of DHCP, careful planning, and diligent network management that helps avoid and resolve these conflicts within a network.

B & C are correct

I thought A is correct but it was not. since they are not routed through public address.

B & C Are correct

The correct answers are: B. They are less costly than public IP addresses. C. They can be assigned to devices without Internet connections.

B e C are correct !

A and C are correct, or better answer considering other options. B refers to private address with some kind of cost, but unlike public squeme, there is no cost at all for private addressing squeme. So i believe this is a trick option.

I think the right answer are C and E.

B and C are correct

AI Say The two benefits of private IPv4 IP addresses are: C. They can be assigned to devices without Internet connections: Private IPv4 addresses can be assigned to devices that do not need to connect to the internet, such as devices that only need to communicate with other devices on the same local network. This conserves public IP addresses for devices that need to connect to the internet. E. They eliminate duplicate IP conflicts: Private IPv4 addresses are used within a local network, so there is no possibility of a conflict with public IP addresses used on the internet. Using private IP addresses eliminates the need for organizations to coordinate with other organizations to ensure that their IP addresses are unique.