exam questions

Exam 200-301 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 200-301 exam

Exam 200-301 topic 1 question 438 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 200-301
Question #: 438
Topic #: 1
[All 200-301 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. Which configuration issue is preventing the OSPF neighbor relationship from being established between the two routers?

  • A. R1 has an incorrect network command for interface Gi1/0.
  • B. R2 should have its network command in area 1.
  • C. R1 interface Gi1/0 has a larger MTU size.
  • D. R2 is using the passive-interface default command.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
oooMooo
Highly Voted 3 years, 6 months ago
You can configure OSPF to ignore MTU size: ip ospf mtu-ignore
upvoted 18 times
[Removed]
3 years, 2 months ago
While true, this is very infrequently configured on business routers. Thus C MTU mismatch is correct.
upvoted 10 times
...
...
tyuipo
Highly Voted 3 years, 6 months ago
The normal or default MTU size typically used is 1500 bytes. Ans: "C" is correct
upvoted 12 times
...
[Removed]
Most Recent 7 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
C is correct OSPF Adjacency is established only when the MTU values of the two routers are matched. The normal or default MTU size typically used is 1500 bytes.
upvoted 2 times
...
picho707
11 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
passive-interface default sets passive in all the interfaces. However, no passive-interface gigabitethernet2/0 and no passive-interface gigabitethernet1/0 remove it from the connecting interfaces allowing it to create a neighboring relationship. Therefore, I go for C.
upvoted 1 times
...
JunsK1e
1 year ago
Selected Answer: C
Answer is C
upvoted 1 times
...
NewJeans
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
https://ine.com/blog/2011-03-30-ospf-and-mtu-mismatch https://www.computernetworkingnotes.com/ccna-study-guide/ospf-neighborship-condition-and-requirement.html
upvoted 2 times
...
Yinxs
1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
MTU mismatch doesn't lead to break of neighbor relationship, only can lead to abnormal work. But the passive-interface will lead the interface stop to send HELLO, than no neighbor set up.
upvoted 1 times
...
ODZA
1 year, 3 months ago
A mismatched mtu prevent ospf from forming full adjacency, not 2 way neighbor relationship so C doesnt make full sense for me though it is the better option among the provided answers
upvoted 1 times
...
Raman1996
2 years, 9 months ago
is the network command issued with correct network address and wildcard bits?
upvoted 2 times
...
vannplus11
3 years, 1 month ago
MTU mismatch between neighboring interfaces. show interface <int-type><int-num> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/13699-29.html?referring_site=bodynav#anc13
upvoted 2 times
...
Chocobo
3 years, 8 months ago
RFC 2328: If the Interface MTU field in the Database Description packet indicates an IP datagram size that is larger than the router can accept on the receiving interface without fragmentation, the Database Description packet is rejected.
upvoted 6 times
[Removed]
3 years, 2 months ago
C is absolutely right. Yes, I've experienced this in the field on several occasions ..an odd issue but a definite sneak up and bang factor - your tunnel and consistent traffic be done. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/116119-technote-ospf-mtu-00.html#:~:text=In%20this%20example%2C%20the%20routers%20have%20GigabitEthernet%20interfaces%20with%20an%20MTU%20set%20to%202000.%20The%20MTU%20of%20the%20L2%20switch%20is%20only%201500%20bytes https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/k9hr35/ospf_mtu/
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago