A company requires redundancy for its multihomed BGP external connections. What two features can be configured on the WAN routers to automate failover for both outbound and inbound traffic? (Choose two.)
AD most likely correct, as they put the accent on BGP ""External"" connections. Otherwise, everything except C can be configured to influence routing. Question may be built based on https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13768-hsrp-bgp.html
If this is a BGP related question I’d go with A, as the AS PATH can be used to influence where the remote AS will deliver traffic to the local AS. If that device fails there’s always the other inbound option.
For outbound, local preference (B) can be used to select preferred outgoing path, but then again weight is also an option, and this is a Cisco exam. I still prefer B because it is a multi-homed design with "routers" (plural), and local pref can be shared in ibgp, while weight is local to the device. My 2 cents
I think A & D are still correct. See following--In the event of a failure of connectivity toward one ISP, the traffic is rerouted dynamically through the other ISP with the BGP set as-path {tag | prepend as-path-string} command and Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP).
I thinks is A and B
local preference can be use to change the outbound ISP preference , changing the incomming prefix preference in our AS
See:Load Sharing When Multihomed to Two ISPs Through Multiple Local Routers
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html
upvoted 4 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-320 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ek2442
5 years, 4 months agoscar
5 years, 4 months agoGoCiscoGo
5 years, 7 months agochst
5 years, 9 months ago