exam questions

Exam 200-301 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 200-301 exam

Exam 200-301 topic 1 question 254 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 200-301
Question #: 254
Topic #: 1
[All 200-301 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. Only four switches are participating in the VLAN spanning-tree process.

Branch-1: priority 614440 -

Branch-2: priority 39391170 -

Branch-3: priority 0 -

Branch-4: root primary -
Which switch becomes the permanent root bridge for VLAN 5?

  • A. Branch-1
  • B. Branch-2
  • C. Branch-3
  • D. Branch-4
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
LOST40
Highly Voted 2 years, 8 months ago
A priority 0 means that it guarantees the switch is always the root bridge of a particular VLAN. You don't need other information.
upvoted 18 times
...
Peter_panda
Highly Voted 1 year, 10 months ago
I just verified with a C2960 and a C1111 - Priority 0 ”beats” root primary, so the right answer is C indeed.
upvoted 12 times
...
[Removed]
Most Recent 7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
C is correct
upvoted 2 times
...
[Removed]
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
STP is a golf game. Lowest score wins. So C is the correct answer. gg good day Go Dodgers
upvoted 3 times
...
mfaria
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Pri 0 beats primary
upvoted 2 times
...
kyleptt
1 year, 3 months ago
Ok I tested it the Pri 0 commands wins the race over the root primary command I was wrong but know I know
upvoted 1 times
...
kyleptt
1 year, 3 months ago
D is correct the Root Primary wins the race
upvoted 1 times
...
zFlyingLotusz
1 year, 3 months ago
Welp, this question does not have enough context. Root primary DOES INDEED supersede priority 0, HOWEVER, if the switch with priority 0 has a lower mac address, it will supersede Root Primary... Poorly written question.
upvoted 1 times
...
GigaGremlin
2 years, 1 month ago
Correct answer is D, because of the manually configured Root Primary of Branch-4. As long it is well and alive Priority 0 doesn't matter. Guess in Cases like this Root Backup would be manually selected to, to prevent unexpected Root election results...
upvoted 1 times
DoBronx
2 years ago
wrong. Priority 0 supersedes that
upvoted 6 times
...
...
[Removed]
2 years, 4 months ago
Ref: CCNP and CCIE Enterprise Core ENCOR 350-401 Official Cert Guide “Advanced STP Tuning … Root Bridge Placement Ideally the root bridge is placed on a core switch, and a secondary root bridge is designated to minimize changes to the overall spanning tree. Root bridge placement is accomplished by lowering the system priority on the root bridge to the lowest value possible, raising the secondary root bridge to a value slightly higher than that of the root bridge, and (ideally) increasing the system priority on all other switches. This ensures consistent placement of the root bridge. …” A. Branch-1 Wrong answer. B. Branch-2 Wrong answer. C. Branch-3 Correct answer. D. Branch-4 Wrong answer.
upvoted 2 times
...
ZUMY
2 years, 4 months ago
C is correct!
upvoted 1 times
ZUMY
2 years, 4 months ago
-Each switch has its own bridge ID and has a default priority value of 32768 -using the ‘root primary’ will set the bridge priority to 24576, which is lower than the default priority.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
[Removed]
2 years, 8 months ago
In this case the best answer is D To ensure the desired switch becomes the permanent root bridge for a specific vlan (in this scenario Vlan5) you must explicitly configure it as the primary https://www.omnisecu.com/cisco-certified-network-associate-ccna/how-to-configure-spanning-tree-protocol-root-primary-and-root-secondary.php think about it if you configure the switch with bridge priority 0 and connect another switch with bridge priority 0 and a lower mac address the root bridge will give up its position and change the topology wheres a switch with the primary role wont give up its position even if a switch with priority 0 and lower mac address is connected
upvoted 2 times
sgashashf
2 years, 8 months ago
But that's now how any of this works. Executing the command "spanning-tree vlan 5 root primary" doesn't place a "primary" tag into the running config, it simply checks the priorities of other switches on the networks and sets its own to 4096 lower. Kane002 is correct, without more information there is literally no way to know which of these switches would be elected root bridge.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
JackBond40
2 years, 9 months ago
I believe there is enough information. Branch 1 has lower priority then Branch 2 so it would become primary between those 2. If election was between Branch 1 and Branch 4 Branch 4 would lower value by 4096 and become primary...then Branch 3 would take primary as it has priority 0. If election was between branch 3 and Branch 1 first Branch 3 would take primary with priority 0. Since Branch 3 is already primary with a priority 0 it will not relinquish primary to Branch 4. Branch 4 will set its priority to 0 but Branch 3 will remain primary while it is active in the STP process.
upvoted 1 times
...
johntan1980
2 years, 10 months ago
Priority 0
upvoted 1 times
...
Kane002
2 years, 10 months ago
Not enough information to answer. Both root primary and priority 0 will have a priority of 0, and go down to the lowest MAC address. Root primary will also generate SNMP complaints that it can't set it's priority to negative 4096, as primary always sets to 4096 below the lowest priority. Best answer is root primary.
upvoted 2 times
...
[Removed]
3 years, 2 months ago
Yeah C
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago