Hi gents,
here my thinking to this topic
A. under traffic classification and marking conditions --> this is not a condition but rather an action and therefore WRONG
B. under interface saturation conditions
Saturation is a condition and NOT BAD
C. under all network conditions
well if this was the case, then the vendor Cisco would have made this a default state and thats it. also WRONG
D. under network convergence conditions
Well the wording is very vague here. a service policy can assign utmost priority to system level tasks that help in convergence, for example try putting OSPF protocol into CS6 or EF marking and implement a Priority Queueing (PQ) then you have made convergence faster but starved out everything else.
Also NOT BAD but why would any clear thinking admin interfere with system level priorities?
as far as i can see, there is only answer B which is NOT BAD answer for a question worded like that.
Answer B
B. Under interface saturation conditions
When the WAN interface is experiencing high utilization or saturation, an outbound QoS policy becomes especially useful. In such conditions, the link might be congested, leading to potential packet drops, latency, or degradation of critical traffic performance. Implementing QoS policies allows prioritization and control of traffic, ensuring that important applications or traffic types receive preferential treatment, minimizing the impact of congestion on critical services.
QoS policies help manage and shape traffic leaving the interface, allowing network administrators to allocate bandwidth, prioritize certain types of traffic (such as voice or video), and mitigate congestion effects during periods of high utilization. This helps in maintaining better network performance and ensuring that essential applications or services continue to function optimally even under saturation conditions.
another stupidly phrased question. if the answer is really A, i think the question needs to be phrased like this: under which conditions will an outbound QoS policy be most beneficial. given this, it would be most beneficial if traffic was marked and classified first. If it wasnt marked or classified, then interface saturation would make no difference. But test makers are trying to craft words in a tricky way, resulting in B seeming like the best answer. I dunnow! dumb question. I hope I don't see this on the exam!
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-401 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
XalaGyan
Highly Voted 3 years, 5 months agouhljeb
2 years agovelozkenneth
Highly Voted 3 years, 8 months agoBT22
Most Recent 7 months, 2 weeks agojorg32
11 months, 1 week ago[Removed]
11 months, 2 weeks agosecretuser
1 year agoIgorLVG
1 year, 2 months agoteems5uk
1 year, 5 months agoHaidary
1 year, 6 months agoorenoren
1 year, 7 months agoermanzan
1 year, 10 months agowr4net
1 year, 11 months agoBlue_Water
2 years agoruiolegario
2 years, 2 months agoruiolegario
2 years, 2 months agocerf
2 years, 2 months agoSpecialdork
2 years, 4 months ago