Refer to the exhibit. Which configuration allows Customer2 hosts to access the FTP server of Customer1 that has the IP address of 192.168.1.200?
A.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 global ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 global ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10 ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
B.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 172.16.1.1 global ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 global ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10 ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
C.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 Customer2 ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 Customer1
D.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 Customer1 ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 Customer2
A.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 global
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 global
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10
ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
B.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 172.16.1.1 global
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 global
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10
ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
C.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 Customer2
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 Customer1
D.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 Customer1
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 Customer2
the correct answer is A.
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 global ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 global ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10 ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
Cannot be "C" or "D" cause there is no such things as Customer1 or Customer2 after the "Forwarding router's address"
"B" is not correct cause the "Destination prefix mask" is /24 for the host 192.168.1.200
"The global keyword specifies that the next hop address of the static route is resolved within the global routing table, not within the the customer1 VRF."
That's why we need the additional static routes in the global routing table for Vlan10 and 20
A.
If you pay attention to the wording of the question.
"Allows customer2 hosts to access the FTP server of customer1 that has IP address of 192.168.1.200"
This indicates that a host route is required to only that FTP server.
B is allowing all customer2 access to the entire customer1 network, not just the FTP server.
Actually B can't work at all. Route for vrf Customer1 only has destination for VLAN IP.
Not sure IOS would accept static route proposed for vrf customer2 either. Prefix IP and mask don't match. Correct syntax would have been:
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 global
no, the goal is for Cus2 to ONLY be able to reach 192.168.1.200. You achieve this by noting a /32 (255.255.255.255) in this case
>>> ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.1 global <<<<
is correct
The correct answer is B.
The configuration in option B allows Customer2 hosts to access the FTP server of Customer1.
In this configuration, the following routes are configured:
For Customer1 VRF:
ip route vrf Customer1 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 172.16.1.1 global
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan10
For Customer2 VRF:
ip route vrf Customer2 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 global
ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan20
These routes ensure that the traffic from Customer2 VRF destined for the FTP server with the IP address 192.168.1.200 is correctly routed through the VRF of Customer1 and reaches the FTP server.
Therefore, option B is the correct configuration.
This answer is allowing the hosts of Customer2 network to access not only the FTP server host, but the entire network where the server lives.
Answer is A.
ip route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0.30
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0.20
ip route vrf cust_1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 global
ip route vrf cust_2 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 global
!
cisco#show ip route vrf cust_1 | b Gate
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 172.16.1.0 [1/0] via 172.16.1.1
192.168.1.0/24 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.20
L 192.168.1.1/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.20
L 192.168.1.200/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.20
cisco#
cisco#show ip route vrf cust_2 | b Gate
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.30
L 172.16.1.1/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.30
S 192.168.1.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
cisco#
from GRT vrf IPs are pingable
cisco#show ip route | b Gate
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.30
S 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.20
192.168.255.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 192.168.255.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.10
L 192.168.255.3/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.10
cisco#ping 192.168.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
cisco#ping 172.16.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/6 ms
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-401 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
xziomal9
Highly Voted 3 years, 1 month agoxziomal9
3 years, 1 month agoiAbdullah
3 years, 1 month agohprc2002
Highly Voted 2 years, 10 months ago[Removed]
Most Recent 5 months, 3 weeks agokouamedsk
7 months, 3 weeks agoMarcinko
8 months agoMarcinko
8 months agoHaidary
10 months, 1 week agoAsombrosso
1 year, 2 months agoAsombrosso
1 year, 2 months ago[Removed]
1 year, 4 months agodanman32
1 year, 3 months agomgiuseppe86
1 year, 2 months agomgiuseppe86
1 year, 2 months agoibogovic
1 year, 4 months ago[Removed]
1 year, 4 months agoHungarianDish_111
1 year, 7 months agoihateciscoreally
1 year, 4 months agonushadu
1 year, 11 months agonushadu
1 year, 11 months agonushadu
1 year, 11 months agociscolessons
2 years, 8 months ago