exam questions

Exam 300-410 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-410 exam

Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 188 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-410
Question #: 188
Topic #: 1
[All 300-410 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. PC-2 failed to establish a Telnet connection to the terminal server.
Which configuration resolves the issue?

  • A. Gateway-Router(config)#ipv6 access-list Default_Access Gateway-Router(config-ipv6-acl)#sequence 25 permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet
  • B. Gateway-Router(config)#ipv6 access-list Default_Access Gateway-Router(config-ipv6-acl)#no sequence 20 Gateway-Router(config-ipv6-acl)#sequence 5 permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet
  • C. Gateway-Router(config)#ipv6 access-list Default_Access Gateway-Router(config-ipv6-acl)#permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet
  • D. Gateway-Router(config)#ipv6 access-list Default_Access Gateway-Router(config-ipv6-acl)#sequence 15 permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Surfside92
Highly Voted 3 years, 8 months ago
Agree with Amgue that connectivity should already work as pc-2 hits the sequence 30 ACE and as it does not match sequence 10 or 20 There may be a typo in the graphic and sequence 20 should actually read : deny tcp any host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet sequence 20 That would make answer D correct. However if there's no typo I go for answer B - it tidies things up the most - not completely as sequence 30 remains - but it looks the best fit.
upvoted 6 times
Surfside92
3 years, 6 months ago
Just to update my comment. If you look at the comment below from JOKERR. There is almost certainly a typo in the question above. That would make the corect answer = D
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Horsefeathers
Most Recent 1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Most fitting answer is D. As mentioned by studybuddy22 B fully allows telnet access to Terminal Server. D instead only allows telnet access to Terminal Server from PC-2 and blocks all other telnet access as originally intended.
upvoted 3 times
...
asans
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Sequence 15 in Answer D "sequence 15 permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet" is similar to Seq 30 and so the router will just take the accept the ACE but not change the configs on the Default_Access ACL. So D doesnt change anything and thus incorrect Sequence 5 in Answer B "sequence 5 permit tcp host 2018:DB1:A:B::2 host 2018:DB1:A:C::1 eq telnet" is the same again as Sequence 30 and has the same effect i.e., it doesn't change anything regarding the configs of Default_Access ACL. However the "no sequence 20 " part in Answer B makes the difference. This is what removes the restriction and thus allow Sequence 30 to allow access. Correct answer is B
upvoted 2 times
...
Chiaretta
2 years ago
The question is where is this ACL applied??? In? Out?
upvoted 1 times
...
inteldarvid
2 years ago
Selected Answer: D
optio corret D: because: rule 5 is duplicated with rule 30. Its not is necesary create rule 5
upvoted 3 times
...
Dacusai
2 years, 3 months ago
Seq 20 block all telnet connection to the server, so we need to introduce one statement before Seq 20 to allow pc2 to access the server.
upvoted 4 times
...
Nhan
3 years, 1 month ago
the given answer is correct since the acl sequence 10 is permitting the pc-1, then we need to add in a nother permit for pc2 with sequence 15 or 12 or 12 ...
upvoted 1 times
...
studybuddy10
3 years, 8 months ago
going for D, B violates security. The purpose of this ACL seems to be protection of telnet only as it allows all at seq 40 from those ranges. So only D, they should remove seq 30 though for cleanup.
upvoted 4 times
...
amgue
3 years, 9 months ago
I think the answer already existe in the show, the permit sequence 30
upvoted 2 times
rob899
1 year, 11 months ago
Although the sequence 30 is a good rule to permit PC-2 to Telnet to the server, it is being blocked by the earlier sequence 20 rule which denies ALL telnet traffic to the server.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
C_Tw21
3 years, 9 months ago
Hi, D works ,. But B should be fine as well. ??
upvoted 1 times
AliMo123
3 years, 9 months ago
it works if we delete sequence 20 but since we have " no sequence 20" in B then only D works here
upvoted 1 times
...
JOKERR
3 years, 7 months ago
D is correct.
upvoted 2 times
...
JOKERR
3 years, 7 months ago
B also works but is not the best answer. Because removing 20 opens up the ACL to any one to telnet to destination. Adding sequence before it completes our objective while still blocking unwanted devices from accessing via telnet.
upvoted 1 times
...
JOKERR
3 years, 7 months ago
Now I am confused, because in exam, I remember that sequence 20 is: deny tcp any host 2018:db1:A:C::1 eq telnet sequence 20 Which is blocking any telnet connection to terminal server. But here if the seq 20 is not terminal server, either A or D should be correct.
upvoted 1 times
YaPet
3 years, 5 months ago
Probably, here is a mistake for the access-list output
upvoted 1 times
...
tefacert
3 years, 2 months ago
Hi did you pass the exam, where did you study from ?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...