DRAG DROP - Drag and drop the snippets onto the blanks within the code to construct a script that adds a prefix list to a route map and sets the local preference. Not all options are used. Select and Place:
I would put the following:
1. “running”: null <<<<target running config
2. “name”:”100″, <<<<< prefix list name "100"
3. “seq_no”: <<<<<<< there is no permit command within a route map. this is the only logical selection here.
4. “match”: again within a route map we can either set, or match.
for this section:
"route-map": {
"name": "Routes",
"route-map-without-order-seq": {
"seq_no": "10",
"set": {
"local-preference": "200"
it definitely is "Seq_no": "10",
"seq_no" is the correct YANG key for route-map sequence numbers (not "permit" or "config").
Key Differences
Feature CLI Syntax YANG/JSON Model
Sequence Combined (permit 10) Separate ("seq_no": "10")
Action Part of command (permit) Often implied or separate field
Purpose Human-friendly Machine-friendly
"running": null
Name:100
Permit
Match
This is a very tricky question. For any production route-map I have ever created and as per Cisco's documentation, you of course can and do specify a permit | deny, without this all traffic that is matched is implicitly denied in the route-map and where it is applied, why some people are stating permit | deny is not used in a route-map is very strange misinformation, it is a key component in the traffic engineering process.
However in rare cases you can create a route-map without a permit or deny statement, specifying a sequence number only which is used to update an existing route-map entry.
It seems too odd that Cisco would ask you to update an existing route-map when no other question I've come across asks for even basic route-map configuration. Surely we create the entry using a standard 'permit' here.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/route_maps.pdf
Suggested answer is wrong. If I understand correctly, correct should be:
* "running": null
* "name":"100"
* "permit"
* "match"
The order in the route-map is a bit odd, the "match" part comes first and after that comes the "set" part...
But, in the running-config (that is the target) in IOS this would be:
* ip prefix-list 100 seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 <- name of prefix-list is "100"
* route-map Routes permit 10 <- "permit" 10
* match ip address prefix-list 100 <- "match" the prefix-list "100"
* set local-preference 200
upvoted 12 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-401 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Caledonia
Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months agoStylar
Highly Voted 2 years, 6 months agoDegen6969
2 years, 1 month agoLanreDipeolu
1 year, 9 months agotltechcert
Most Recent 1 month agotltechcert
1 month agochmacnp
3 months ago4121e3c
10 months, 2 weeks ago4121e3c
10 months, 2 weeks ago[Removed]
1 year ago[Removed]
1 year, 1 month ago[Removed]
1 year agoeww_cybr
1 year, 11 months agoHarwinderSekhon
2 years agojackr76
2 years, 3 months agobora4motion
2 years, 6 months agoMO_2022
2 years, 6 months agoCer_Pit
2 years, 7 months ago