exam questions

Exam 350-501 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 350-501 exam

Exam 350-501 topic 1 question 273 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 350-501
Question #: 273
Topic #: 1
[All 350-501 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. The network engineer who manages ASN 65001 is troubleshooting suboptimal routing to the 198.18.15.0/24 prefix. According to the network requirements:
✑ Routing to IP destinations in the 198.18.15.0/25 block must be preferred via the EDGE-1 PE.
✑ Routing to IP destinations in the 198.18.15.128/25 block must be preferred via the EDGE-2 PE.
✑ More specific prefixes of the 198.18.15.0/24 block must not be advertised beyond the boundaries of ASN 64611.
✑ Routing to 198.18.15.0/24 must be redundant in case one of the uplinks on INT-R1 fails.
Which configuration must the network engineer implement on INT-R1 to correct the suboptimal routing and fix the issue?

  • A. configure terminal route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT if destination in (198.18.15.0/25) then set community (no-export, peeras:65001) done endif if destination in (198.18.15.0/24) then prepend as-path 65001 3 done endif drop end-policy ! router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1 address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT out end
  • B. configure terminal route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT if destination in (198.18.15.0/25) then set community (internal, peeras:65001) done endif if destination in (198.18.15.0/24) then done endif drop end-policy ! router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1 address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT out end
  • C. configure terminal route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT if destination in (198.18.15.0/25) then set community (no-advertise, peeras:65001) done endif if destination in (198.18.15.128/25) then prepend as-path 65001 3 done endif drop end-policy ! router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1 address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT out end
  • D. configure terminal route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT if destination in (198.18.15.0/25) then set community (no-export, peeras:65001) done endif if destination in (198.18.15.128/25) then prepend as-path 65001 3 done endif drop end-policy ! router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1 address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT in end
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
cocopost
6 months, 2 weeks ago
The point of this route map should be to select only 198.18.15.0/25 prefix outbound to neighbor EDGE-1 and set no-export. The longer prefix /25 will be preferred by ASBR-1 and will send to destination via router EDGE-1 The other destination 198.18.15.128/25 contained in 198.18.15.0/24, will default to EDGE-2 There are no correct answers here. A's logic is correct. accomplishes the desired goal. B logic is correct but has unnecessary prepend C Incorrecct logic does nothing to accomplish the goal But A, B, C are all wrong because they set "no-advertise" on the desired route. D logic is correct . D is the only answer with the correct community "no-export" But D is wrong because it sets route-map as "in" I select A because it has the least number of problems. Answer A
upvoted 1 times
...
sushil_bhattacharjee
8 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: A
A. configure terminal route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT if destination in (198.18.15.0/25) then set community (no-export, peeras:65001) endif if destination in (198.18.15.0/24) then prepend as-path 65001 3 endif drop end-policy ! router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1 address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT out exit-address-family exit Note: "no-export" satisfy the requirement of question not going beyond 64611 D: the policy is "in" direction, wrong, though it hs "no-export"
upvoted 2 times
...
mancora
1 year, 4 months ago
There are 4 types of standard communities: Internet: Match all communities local-as:keep tagged prefixes in the local as no -advertise: prevent tagged prefixes from being advertised to any iBGP peer no-export: prevent tagged prefixes from being announced to eBGP peers
upvoted 1 times
...
thejag
1 year, 7 months ago
Answer A First, which community? Community no-export is what we need to advertise no further than ASN 64611 - WE NEED THIS ONE Community no-advertise will not advertise it through to ASBR-1 Community internal does not exist Leaves choices of A or D Notice the direction the policy is applied, we need the policy to be applied for advertisments OUT: A has "route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT out" D has "route-policy ASN65001-SPECIFIC-OUT in"
upvoted 3 times
...
chst
1 year, 8 months ago
It's C " destination in (198.18.15.128/25) then prepend as-path 65001 3 " to apply under "router bgp 65001 neighbor 100.65.0.1" to meet this point: Routing to IP destinations in the 198.18.15.0/25 block must be preferred via the EDGE-1 PE.
upvoted 1 times
thejag
1 year, 7 months ago
Routing to IP destinations in the 198.18.15.0/25 is already preferred via the EDGE-1. ASBR-1 has picked that already, check the "sjow bgp ipv4" outputs from ASBR-1 an EDGE-1. The other half of the network 198.18.15.128/25 is not explicitly advertised but will be included in the /24 which in option A we are making to be preferred via EDGE-2 by increasing the AS path.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Samarjit1983
1 year, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: A
no-export is the key-word. As path prepend for /24 ... what is the requirement ?
upvoted 1 times
...
nottoday2077
1 year, 9 months ago
Answer is A. A - No-export can be sent and allows advertising to iBGP neighbors in the peering AS without it exporting to another AS. Also advertises the /24. B - internal is not a well-known community. C - no-advertise would not allow it to be advertised internally in the neighboring AS. D - Does not advertise /24.
upvoted 1 times
...
Zee81
1 year, 11 months ago
i think D is correct, as 198.18.15.0/25 should be prefered via EDGE1 whille 198.18.15.128/25 should only use EDGE 1 when link b/w EDGE2 to INT-R1 is down
upvoted 2 times
...
mohdema
2 years ago
Selected Answer: A
no-export The "no export" BGP community tells BGP to advertise a prefix only to iBGP neighbors.
upvoted 4 times
...
Panterarossa
2 years, 1 month ago
I think the right answer is C. Community should be no-advertise.
upvoted 3 times
Panterarossa
2 years, 1 month ago
I was wrong, the right answer is A and the community should be NO-EXPORT which is used to block sending prefixes outside AS. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/s/question/0D53i00000KswppCAB/bgp-community-noexport-vs-noadvertise Forget my previous comment.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago