Exam 200-301 topic 1 question 167 discussion

questions like this have convinced me that to pass the CCNA it is necessary to bone up on dumps

long cable = late collisions speed mismatch = port wont go up/up int the first place high bandwidth = not a reason for detecting FCS errors

it´s A

believe correct answer is C: high bandwidth usage. Cable faulty will cut off communication, question relates to slow connection. Latency is ok, so it means cable long is ok, speed o duplex mismatch will cut off comunication as well, so better answer will be C.

The cause of the throughput issue described in the scenario is a physical cable fault. The scenario mentions that the network engineer found minimal latency on connections to the server, but data transfers are unreliable, and the output of the "show interfaces counters errors" command shows a high FCS-Err count on the interface that is connected to the server. FCS-Err (Frame Check Sequence error) indicates that there is a physical issue with the cable, such as noise or interference, that is causing the data transfer errors. A speed mismatch or high bandwidth usage may cause slow throughput or delays, but it would not cause FCS-Err errors. Similarly, a cable that is too long may cause signal attenuation, but it would not cause FCS-Err errors. Therefore, the answer to the question "What is the cause of the throughput issue?" is A. a physical cable fault.

The cause of the throughput issue is most likely a physical cable fault. The high FCS-Err count on the interface indicates that there are frame check sequence errors occurring on the link between the switch and the server. These errors are typically caused by a physical problem with the cable or the network interface card (NIC) on either end of the link.

Anyone know why is it not D? Is it because we don't know anything about the cable; IE too specific without justification?