Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 82 discussion

Just put the IP back to the interface and you're good. R1(config)#ip vrf CCNP R1(config-vrf)#rd 1:100 R1(config-vrf)#exit R1(config)#int lo 0 R1(config-if)# R1(config-if)#ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 R1(config-if)#ip vrf forwarding CCNP % Interface Loopback0 IPv4 disabled and address(es) removed due to disabling VRF CCNP R1(config-if)#exit R1(config)#do show run int lo 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 66 bytes ! interface Loopback0 ip vrf forwarding CCNP no ip address end

B is the correct answer

It is because they typed the VRF command AFTER the ip address, the ip got removed, so we need to add it back...

correct B

like Dacusai comment.

Just another cisco thing, when you add the vrf command on an int the ip is removed so you need to added after, the correct answer should be the vrf command follow by the Ip int command. Tricky.

After adding the int to the VRF, the assigned IP address is removed, so we just need to reconfigure the IP address on that same int.

B is correct, as the vrf statement removes the IP address from the interface, therefore we have to re-add the IP address command

This is a stupid question. The questions asks for the VRF CCNP to work and not for the loopback ip address to work by its own. Answer B - if you want just the loopback to work without a vrf and answer C - for the loopback interface to be part of a vrf.

D is the correct answer. Once you assign the ip address to lookback interface, you need to enable the "ip vrf forwarding CCNP".