IMHO, B or C seem to be both OK. They would like to police SSH traffic only from source 192.168.12.1.
So, they need to match the traffic with an access-list:
10 permit tcp host 192.168.12.1 any eq 22 -> Police (rate-limit) this traffic
20 deny tcp any any eq 22 -> Allow this traffic unconstrained
Then they use it in the class-map SSH:
class-map SSH
match access-group 100
policy-map CoPP
class SSH
This CoPP constrains traffic from 192.168.12.1 (matched by "permit"), but allows hosts with any other source address without constraint (excluded by "deny").
They have to "deny" SSH traffic from any other source addresses in the ACL so that they are excluded from "class-map SSH".
They will be matched and allowed unconstrained by the “class-default” which is implemented implicitly at the end of the policy-map.
Good example + explanation:
https://www.networktut.com/control-plane-policing-copp-tutorial
upvoted 1 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-410 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
xzckk
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months agoMad_Scorpion
2 years, 4 months agoPietjeplukgeluk
1 year, 3 months ago1chung
Most Recent 1 month ago[Removed]
10 months, 1 week agoZamanR
1 year, 5 months agoHungarianDish_111
2 years agoHungarianDish_111
2 years ago