Refer to the exhibits. London must reach Rome using a faster path via EIGRP if all the links are up, but it failed to take this path. Which action resolves the issue?
A.
Change the administrative distance of RIP to 150.
B.
Increase the bandwidth of the link between London and Barcelona.
C.
Use the network statement on London to inject the 172.16.X.0/24 networks into EIGRP.
D.
Use the network statement on Rome to inject the 172.16.X.0/24 networks into EIGRP.
correct!
Prefixes from Rome are only advertised in RIP (AD-120). After advertising it in EIGRP these prefixes will be preferred by London site. Additionally, London site performs redistribution of connected routes in EIGRP (see output).
D is correct, also tested it. If LAN segments (172.16.3.0/24, 172.16.4.0/24) on Rome are advertised by EIGRP then London is choosing the path with the higher bandwidth (minimum BW is 1GB) to reach the LANs on Rome. (Of course, to reach the router Rome, it is choosing the directly connected link with AD 0.)
That's right.
The AD of EIGRP is 90 and RIP 120 all of us know that for sure...
The key point there is that actually London is not receiving the Rome routes via EIGRP.
London is redistributing his connected networks via eigrp so that is fine.
At this point this mean that in the Rome router we are not advertising the networks via EIGRP but only via RIP.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-410 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Zizu007
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months agoHungarianDish_111
Highly Voted 2 years ago[Removed]
Most Recent 10 months, 1 week agoXBfoundX
10 months, 2 weeks ago[Removed]
10 months, 2 weeks ago