Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 347 discussion

I don't believe D is correct the question asks to make the the route to 10.1.3.2 the feasible successor not the successor

Correct is "C". https://networklessons.com/eigrp/eigrp-wide-metrics Further info: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/16406-eigrp-toc.html If it is necessary to influence the path EIGRP chooses, always use delay to do so. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/13673-14.html There are two reasons you must not to use the bandwidth to influence EIGRP paths: -If you change the bandwidth it can have impact beyond the effect to the EIGRP metrics. -When you lower the bandwidth it can prevent EIGRP neighbors that get hello packets because it throttles back. If you change the delay it does not impact other protocols nor does it cause EIGRP to throttle back.

C is correct

yesy optio c correct

10.1.3.2 can't be the feasible successor since feasibility condition is not met. Apart from that, it should be C.

D will make 10.1.3.2 the successor

Answer is C

D will make 10.1.3.2 the successor and we don't want that.

I also think C is the right answer, minimum path bandwidth lower than 10.1.1.2 and higher than 10.1.2.2 should do it. But again a weird question from Cisco, we don't know anything about the cumulative delay and other parameters such as the number of hops between the local router and the destination for each path. B could also do it since all we want here is meeting the feasibility condition for the 10.1.3.2 path. But C is the more likely to be true.