Refer to the exhibit. An engineer applies a prefix-list filter that filters most of the network 10 prefixes instead of allowing them. Which action resolves the issue?
A.
Modify the ip prefix-list EIGRP seq 20 permit 10.0.0.0/8 ge 9 command.
B.
Modify the ip prefix-list EIGRP seq 10 permit 10.0.0.0/8 le 9 command.
C.
Modify the ip prefix-list EIGRP seq 20 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 command.
D.
Modify the ip prefix-list EIGRP seq 10 permit 10.0.0.0/8 le 32 command.
I would say the question describes the issue is engineer intend to permit 10.0.0.0/8 networks but only 10.0.0.0/8 left, other precise subnet like 10.1.1.0/24 missed. how to fix it.
then we can say option D is the correct answer.
Correct answer: D
ip prefix-list EIGRP seq 10 permit 10.0.0.0/8 le 32
@ellen_AA:
I think the goal is to allow the prefixes contained in 10.0.0.0/8, not deny them.
So we need to add 'le 32' statement within the permit sequence.
I am confused, doesn't the question say the engineer is filtering most of the 10 networks instead of allowing them? I am very confused with this question.
No the prefix-list filters the prefixes instead of allowing them. Therefor he needs to allow them. Answer D
upvoted 2 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.300-410 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ClaudeYun
Highly Voted 2 years, 1 month ago[Removed]
Most Recent 9 months, 4 weeks agointeldarvid
1 year, 10 months agoLilienen
2 years, 3 months agoGReddy2323
2 years, 2 months agoellen_AA
2 years, 4 months agobk989
10 months ago