C. In a BEC attack, the attacker typically impersonates a high-ranking executive or authority figure within the organization and requests sensitive information or actions from employees. In this case, the HR director is requesting log-in credentials for a cloud administrator account, which is a classic example of BEC where the attacker seeks to gain access to privileged accounts through deception.
Answer: A.
It could be C if there wasn't a better option, but a BEC is about impersonating, and in the answer choice C it doesn't specify that someone is acting as hr, whereas A is a better choice because they are clear that someone is being impersonated. Your boss requests documents all the time, they don't need to demand it. The choice is clearly A.
The best answer is C. The HR Director is not your boss, but someone high in your organization. They are asking for cloud administrator credentials, which has nothing to do with HR, so there is a chance that the directors email account has been compromised and the hacker is now hoping that you will just give in to their request because of the higher rank. In this situation you would follow up with the HR Director in person to determine if they actually made the request and if they really need the credentials for a legitimate reason.
The fact that the email has the executive's name in the display field strongly suggest impersonation which is a hallmark of BEC. Both A and C involve impersonation which is central to BEC with scenario A being a class BEC because it is specifically leveraging the executives identity to request gift card which is a common BEC tactic.
But the exec’s name being in a field doesn’t indicate there’s a compromise. Receiving a direct email from the HR director indicates that the HR director’s email has been compromised.
A BEC involves a fraudulent email that appears to come from a trusted executive or employee and is used to trick someone into transferring money, sensitive data, or credentials.
The correct answer is C.
Business email compromise (BEC) is a type of cybercrime where the scammer uses email to trick someone into sending money or divulging confidential company info. The culprit poses as a trusted figure, then asks for a fake bill to be paid or for sensitive data they can use in another scam. It is a type of phishing attack that targets organizations with a view to steal money or sensitive information.
Only option where a trusted entity is impersonated and a request for sensitive information is made is C.
This scenario describes a Business Email Compromise (BEC) attack:
BEC attacks typically involve impersonating a trusted figure in the organization (like a CEO or executive).
The attacker spoofs the display name to make the email look legitimate.
These emails often ask for urgent actions such as wiring money, sending sensitive data, or purchasing gift cards.
They usually don't involve attachments or obvious malware — just social engineering.
A Business Email Compromise (BEC) is a targeted social engineering attack where the attacker impersonates a company executive or high-level employee (like a CEO or CFO) to trick an employee—often in finance or HR—into:
-Sending money (e.g., wiring funds or buying gift cards)
-Disclosing sensitive information
-Changing payment account details
✅ Why A is correct:
The attacker spoofs the executive’s name in the “From” field, attempting to trick the employee into acting quickly without verifying the request.
Gift card scams are a common variant of BEC, especially those pretending to be from executives asking assistants or finance staff to urgently buy cards.
Option | Scenario | Type of Attack
A | Impersonates an executive asking for gift cards | ✅ BEC attack (common tactic)
B | Ransom message after opening an attachment | ❌ Ransomware, not BEC
C | Credential theft request from HR director | ❌ Phishing or Social Engineering, but not necessarily BEC
D | Link to a fake email login portal | ❌ Phishing, not BEC
For those answering A, this attack doesn't necessarily need to come from an internal address. Although it can in some cases, in quite a few cases the attack originates from a freemail user that changed their display name to match the display name of a C level or other executive. Option C is the only one (as of April 18, 2025) that could originate from inside the organization that fits the bill.
Email account compromise (EAC) vs BEC
In many cases the objective of a BEC attacker and EAC attacker are the same: They want to steal money, data or other sensitive information. However, the key difference is that in a BEC attack, the hacker is merely posing as a trusted figure, such as a business executive, lawyer, or important vendor, usually via a spoofed email account. That person then attempts to direct an employee or other person to take a given action, such as wiring funds to the attacker’s account.
In EAC attacks, however, the attacker breaches a legitimate email account and acts as the owner of that account. With access to real credentials, the actor is able to conduct fraudulent activity and bypass multi-factor authentication tools.
Business Email Compromise (BEC) typically involves attackers impersonating a trusted authority—like an executive, HR director, or other high-level personnel—to deceive employees into taking actions that compromise security or financial assets. In Option C, the email appears to be from someone in a position of trust (the HR director) making a request that seems unusual (asking for login credentials), which fits the classic BEC pattern.
I believe it is A, as they muddled the question to state "display field" and not simply From:
It best meets a BEC attach when you change the question to read from the CEO.
A and C are correct, but A is the most common example of a BEC attack; cuz this is a classic BEC attack where an attacker spoofs an executive's email and asks for gift cards or money.
This is a typical BEC scenario, where an attacker impersonates an executive and asks for a gift card or financial transfer, often in an urgent or confidential manner.
C - Is an attempt to steal login credentials, but it is not a typical BEC attack. BEC usually involves financial manipulation or social engineering related to authority figures, not credential theft.
An employee receives a gift card request in an email that has an executive’s name in the display field of the email, as it describes a Business Email Compromise (BEC) attack. BEC relies on social engineering rather than malware or phishing links, where attackers impersonate executives or trusted individuals to manipulate employees into making financial transactions, such as purchasing gift cards or wiring money. Unlike phishing, BEC does not involve fake login pages but instead creates a sense of urgency to pressure the target.
The best answer is A. The email request for a service implies that the email account has already been compromised. In answer C, the HR director is requesting information in an "attempt" to compromise the user's account. Flagging said email would mean that the attack has been averted and NOT compromised.
At first, I was going to pick A but C fits the description more. In this case, why would a HR Coordinator ask for the login credentials of an employee. If they needed information, they could've asked the manager or director but most times they can access themselves.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.SY0-701 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
lauren2wright
Highly Voted 1 year agoTheMichael
10 months, 1 week agoSnooozey
9 months, 3 weeks agoa4e15bd
9 months, 2 weeks agoAces155
5 months, 1 week agoSparky80
Most Recent 5 days, 6 hours agofisher004
1 week, 3 days agoJon_Million
2 weeks, 5 days agoEkim149
3 weeks, 3 days ago8f23125
1 month, 1 week agoeroc1990
1 month, 1 week agoZhugeLiang
2 months agoIT_dude_in_training
2 months, 1 week agoBrian_Douglas
2 months, 2 weeks agoBik047
2 months, 2 weeks agoWoodiynho
2 months, 2 weeks agoJackExam2025
3 months agoiamose
3 months, 1 week agolloocckkeeyy
3 months, 1 week agoCyberfox9001
3 months, 2 weeks agoHasss
3 months, 2 weeks ago