Exam CS0-003 topic 1 question 238 discussion

The best approach to address the reporting issue in this scenario would be Option B: researching federal laws, regulatory compliance requirements, and organizational policies to document specific reporting Service Level Agreements (SLAs). By understanding the legal and regulatory landscape, the organization can establish clear guidelines for external reporting, ensuring timely and accurate notifications when incidents occur. This proactive approach helps prevent discrepancies and ensures compliance with reporting obligations.

The best answer is: B. Researching federal laws, regulatory compliance requirements, and organizational policies to document specific reporting SLAs Explanation: The issue identified in the lessons learned review is confusion over who is responsible for external reporting and when it should be done. Different data breaches require different reporting timelines based on laws such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, as well as industry regulations. By researching and documenting specific reporting SLAs (Service Level Agreements), the organization ensures clarity on reporting timelines and responsibilities in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

D seems to be the answer but the answer is B. The issue is understanding "who was responsible" and what the timing requirements are. You get this from laws, regulations, and SLAs. This helps determine what you do in D.

D seems to be the answer but the answer is B. The issue is understanding "who was responsible" and what the timing requirements are. You get this from laws, regulations, and SLAs. This helps determine what you do in D.

D is the best choice, as it directly addresses the core problem of unclear responsibilities and reporting timing during a data breach.

A playbook would solve all problems, the confusion about who is to make the report and also the timings. Every other answer only addresses 1 part of the question.

I asked Chatgpt what is discussed here: Which is the best option? **If the issue identified during the lessons learned review is primarily about understanding what needs to be reported and when according to legal or regulatory requirements, then B would indeed be the most appropriate action. It ensures that the organization has a clear, documented understanding of reporting obligations, which can then be communicated to those responsible. **If the issue is more about internal confusion over who should be doing the reporting and the timing within the organization, D would be the best choice to ensure clear assignment of responsibilities. Given the context of your question: If the discrepancies in the review were related to understanding external reporting requirements (e.g., legal timelines, specific regulatory obligations), then B would indeed be the most appropriate action to take.

C and D both make sense here

Designating specific roles and responsibilities ensures that there is no ambiguity about who needs to take action during an incident. This clarity is essential for efficient and effective incident response, particularly for tasks like external reporting, which are time-sensitive and have significant compliance implications. Once roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, they can be integrated into playbooks and other procedural documents to ensure a comprehensive approach.

Option C is the most effective action because it directly resolves the identified issue by providing clarity on when and how external notifications and incident reporting should occur. This proactive approach helps strengthen the organization's incident response capabilities and compliance posture